BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Plugging In! Is it efficient?

Problem Solving — algebra and arithmetic (GMAT Focus Edition)
Expert replies
Source: — Quantitative Reasoning |

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Thu Mar 29, 2012 8:24 am
Mochad wrote:Hi,

How far is Plugging In technique efficient in algebra problems? And do you recommend other techniques?

Best wishes,
Mochad
I'm assuming that "Algebra Problems" are the same as "Variables in the Answer Choices" questions.

I would say that plugging in is not as efficient as solving these questions algebraically. Plugging in can take a LOT more time.

For example, consider this rudimentary question.

Joe has J dollars and Mona has M dollars. If they combine their money, how much will they have?
A) J+M
B) JM
C) J-M
D) J/M
E) J^M


The Plug-In method tells us to choose some values for J and M.
Let's say that J=2 and M=2.
When J and M have these values, Joe's and Mona's combined wealth is 4 dollars.

Now we need to plug J=2 and M=2 into each answer choice, and see which one evaluates to be 4.

A) 2+2=4 (bingo)
B) (2)(2) = 4 (bingo)
C) 2-2 = 0 (nope - eliminate it)
D) 2/2 = 1 (nope - eliminate it)
E) 2^2 - 4 (bingo)

Hmmm, it looks like the correct answer is A, B or E

At this point, we need to plug in some different numbers to whittle the field down to just one correct answer. For example, if we let J=5 and M=2, we can see that only answer choice A yields a combined wealth of 7 when we plug J=5 and M=2 into the expression.

So, in this example, plugging in works, but it can take a lot of time.
The fastest way to solve these questions is the apply some reasoning and algebra.

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion