BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

PLS HELP TO SOLVE-matrix pattern and design

Expert replies
by ekshyam » Fri Nov 18, 2011 8:55 am
An experiment was done in which human subjects recognize a pattern within a matrix of abstract designs and
then select another design that completes that pattern. The results of the experiment were surprising. The
lowest expenditure of energy in neurons in the brain was found in those subjects who performed most
successfully in the experiments.
Which of the following hypotheses best accounts for the findings of the experiment?
(A) The neurons of the brain react less when a subject is trying to recognize patterns than when the subject is
doing other kinds of reasoning.
(B) Those who performed best in the experiment experienced more satisfaction when working with abstract
patterns than did those who performed less well.
(C) People who are better at abstract pattern recognition have more energy-efficient neural connections.
(D) The energy expenditure of the subjects' brains increases when a design that completes the initially
recognized pattern is determined.
(E) The task of completing a given design is more capably performed by athletes, whose energy expenditure
is lower when they are at rest.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by VivianKerr » Fri Nov 18, 2011 11:00 am
Conclusion: Surprising results

Evidence: Low neuron-energy = successful performance

Rephrase: What could explain why low neuron-energy = strong perf?

Prediction: Pattern-recognition doesn't require neuron-energy. There is a reason why the successful people didn't have high-neuron activity.

B, D, and E can quickly be eliminated.

C is correct, since A's comparison between "other kinds of reasoning" is irrelevant to the experiment.

Notice how C is a close match to our prediction.
Vivian Kerr
GMAT Rockstar, Tutor
https://www.GMATrockstar.com
https://www.yelp.com/biz/gmat-rockstar-los-angeles

Former Kaplan and Grockit instructor, freelance GMAT content creator, now offering affordable, effective, Skype-tutoring for the GMAT at $150/hr. Contact: [email protected]

Thank you for all the "thanks" and "follows"! :-)
Join the discussion

by gunjan1208 » Fri Nov 18, 2011 9:26 pm
Ya, Its C for me too.
Join the discussion

by parisi04 » Mon Nov 21, 2011 9:02 pm
VivianKerr wrote:Conclusion: Surprising results

Evidence: Low neuron-energy = successful performance

Rephrase: What could explain why low neuron-energy = strong perf?

Prediction: Pattern-recognition doesn't require neuron-energy. There is a reason why the successful people didn't have high-neuron activity.

B, D, and E can quickly be eliminated.

C is correct, since A's comparison between "other kinds of reasoning" is irrelevant to the experiment.

Notice how C is a close match to our prediction.
Hi VivianKerr,

What's confusing me about the explanation you provided is the Prediction/Conclusion relation. For the conclusion to be surprising, shouldn't the prediction be something like: Pattern-recognition does require neuron-energy.

With this kind of prediction, the findings will really be surprising. We predicted that pattern-recognition require neuron-energy, but found the opposite; successful performers have lower energy neuron energy expenditure.

Thanks
Join the discussion