Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Pls help!!

Expert replies
by tapanmittal » Mon Aug 17, 2015 10:21 am
Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary schools as cleaners or
pesticides causes allergic reactions in some children. Elementary school nurses in
Renston report that the proportion of schoolchildren sent to them for treatment of
allergic reactions to those chemicals has increased significantly over the past ten
years. Therefore, either Renston’s schoolchildren have been exposed to greater
quantities of the chemicals, or they are more sensitive to them than schoolchildren
were ten years ago.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
(A) The number of school nurses employed by Renston’s elementary
schools has not decreased over the past ten years.
(B) Children who are allergic to the chemicals are no more likely than other
children to have allergies to other substances.
(C) Children who have allergic reactions to the chemicals are not more
likely to be sent to a school nurse now than they were ten years ago.
(D) The chemicals are not commonly used as cleaners or pesticides in
houses and apartment buildings in Renston.
(E) Children attending elementary school do not make up a larger
proportion of Renston’s population now than they did ten years ago.

OA after discussion
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by ddg » Mon Aug 17, 2015 11:32 am
Premise: Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary schools as cleaners or
pesticides causes allergic reactions in some children.
Premise: Elementary school nurses in Renston report that the proportion of schoolchildren sent to them for treatment of allergic reactions to those chemicals has increased significantly over the past ten
years.
Conclusion: Therefore, either Renston’s schoolchildren have been exposed to greater
quantities of the chemicals, or they are more sensitive to them than schoolchildren
were ten years ago.


(A) The number of school nurses employed by Renston’s elementary
schools has not decreased over the past ten years - the no. of school nurses decreased or increased doesn't affect the conclusion in any way (so A is out)
(B) Children who are allergic to the chemicals are no more likely than other
children to have allergies to other substances. - There is No comparison going on in the passage between children getting allergy of category A with children getting allergy of category B (So B is out)
(C) Children who have allergic reactions to the chemicals are not more
likely to be sent to a school nurse now than they were ten years ago. - Negation of this reads: Children are more likely to be sent to nurses now than they were 10 years ago - if so, then the nurses can't be sure about their statement in their conclusion ---> this is because they need proper comparable data to make such statements, for which children should be approximately likely to be sent to nurses now as they were 10 yrs ago. (SO C IS CORRECT)
(D) The chemicals are not commonly used as cleaners or pesticides in
houses and apartment buildings in Renston - Doesn't explain why children are more likely to be allergic to the chemicals. This also doesnt tell why they may be sensitive to the chemicals. (So D is out)
(E) Children attending elementary school do not make up a larger
proportion of Renston’s population now than they did ten years ago - proportion of children not imp (So E is out)

OA = C
Hope this helps :)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In times of stress, fashion is always outrageous
Join the discussion