BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Pls come a titan, or instructor or something, need help

Expert replies
by tracyyahoo » Fri Sep 30, 2011 12:36 am
A survey of entrepreneurs who started companies last year shows that while virtually all did substantial preparatory research and planning, only half used that work to produce a formal business plan. Since, on average, the entrepreneurs without formal plans secured the capital they needed in half the time of those with plans, these survey results indicate that, in general, formal plans did not help the entrepreneurs who produced them to secure the capital they needed.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. Companies started by entrepreneurs who had used formal business plans to attract investment were on the whole as profitable in their first year as were companies started by entrepreneurs who had not produced such plans.
B. In surveys of entrepreneurs who have attempted without success to raise sufficient capital, more than half of the respondents indicate that they have produced a formal business plan.
C. Among the entrepreneurs surveyed, those who did not produce formal business plans sought and received a much larger proportion of their capital from investors with whom they had a long-standing business relationship.
D. The entrepreneurs surveyed who did not produce a formal business plan spent nearly as much time doing preparatory research and planning as the entrepreneurs who produced plans.
E. The entrepreneurs who produced business plans generally reported later that the process of writing the plan had increased their confidence that their company would succeed.

Why not A?? I think A really weakens, I think C is wrong???

Pls explain me and thank you
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by CappyAA » Fri Sep 30, 2011 7:33 am
The argument says that formal plans did not help the entrepreneurs who produced them to secure the capital they needed because, on average, the entrepreneurs without formal plans secured the capital they needed in half the time with those plans.

So for our weakener, we should look to find an alternative explanation for why the entrepreneurs without formal plans secured the capital.

C does exactly this. It states that the entreprenaurs without plans raised a large proportion of its capital from investors whom they already had a long-standing business relationship. This offers an alternative explanation for why they got the money that is unrelated to whether or not they have a formal business plan.

A is wrong because it shifts the scope of the argument. A talks about profitability, which is not in scope for the argument. The argument is simply concerned about raising capital.

B slightly strengthens the argument saying that more than half of those that could not raise capital produced a formal business plan.

D does not talk about raising capital and only brings up the preparatory research.

E is a scope shift again and discusses whether a company would succeed - not whether it would raise capital.
Taking the GMAT Again...PhD this time!

October 2008 Score: GMAT - 750 (50 Q, 41 V) :D

Manhattan GMAT 1 - 11/20/11 - 750 (50 Q, 42 V)
Manhattan GMAT 2 - 12/3/11 - 780 (51 Q, 45 V)
Join the discussion

by GmatKiss » Sun Oct 02, 2011 8:48 am
Between A and C.

A deals only with PROFIT(not CAPITAL) and for the FIRST YEAR.
C is a contender for having "much larger proportion of their capital" and "long-standing business relationship"

C is correct!

Regards,
GK
Join the discussion

by knight247 » Sun Oct 02, 2011 9:14 am
Hi Tracy,
A) If any thing, this option actually strengthens the argument. If the companies that had a business plan and the companies that did not have a business plan were both equally profitable and successful then it only lends credence to the authors claim that formal plans did not help the entrepreneurs. Also, this kinda goes a little off topic in discussing profits when the subject of debate is the raising of capital and the timeframe for the same.
Join the discussion