BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

please rate my essay. close to D-day

Expert replies
by mkhanna » Sun Sep 27, 2009 4:11 am
Analysis of an issue

"Allowing indivivuals to work flexible schedules is an idea that makes sense."

Many companies often face the dilemma of deciding whether to let employees use the traditional method of working from office or the exercise the more flexible option of working from home. Though working from home has many advantages, including letting indivivuals spend more time with family, face lesser commute, and take fewer leaves from work due to sickness or other personal reasons, the idea of working from office seems to make more sense.

Firstly and most importantly, most employees function better is an environment where they are being supervised. If the boss is around, people will concentrate more on their work and will waste lesser amount of time. When people know that they being watched, they will be more careful about how they are perceived by others and will focus more on their work.

Secondly, since people are generally required to work in teams, an office environment enables people to coordinate work easily with other team members. As opposed to this, people working from home are in an isolated environment with modes of interaction limited to the phone or emails. In cases where face-to-face meetings are required, a traditional working environment is definitely more viable. Also, in an office environment, other team members are available for help and problem solving. Other technical resources, which employees otherwise may not have access to, are available at work.

In conclusion, the option of working from office clearly seems to make much more sense than the option of working from home. Though there are aguments for both sides, the traditional option from working from office allows people to be happier and more productive than people working from home.
Join the discussion
Source: — GMAT Essays (AWA) |

by salesian » Tue Sep 29, 2009 2:04 pm
I'd give it a 5 - I would've liked one more example as well as an example of the 'other' arguments you referred to.

GMAT grading may possibly give this a 6.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1