BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Please rate my essay-Argument

Expert replies
by rkonkar » Sat Jan 01, 2011 8:14 am
Argument
Two years ago Nova High School began to use interactive computer instruction in three academic subjects. The school dropout rate declined immediately and last year's graduates have reported some impressive achievements in college. In future budgets the school board should use a greater portion of the available funds to buy more computers and all schools in the district should adopt interactive computer instruction throughout the curriculum.
In the aforesaid argument, the author tries to imply two things. Firstly, he tries say that with the introduction of interactive computer instruction, the dropout ratio has declined drastically. Secondly, he mentions that the performances of the graduates have shown immensely excellent progress. Thus we can conclude that there has been an optimistic change at Nova school with the introduction of computers. However, after analyzing the topic, I feel that too much emphasis on computer education will prove expensive as well as tedious.
I believe that computer is a revolutionary way to impart education as it is a self learning tool. Introducing computer interactive program would mean pumping more funds. However, not all districts can enforce computer education as there are budgeting issues. There are regions in the districts that are poor, so the boards in all schools cannot utilize greater portion of funds for the purchase of computers. Hence maximizing the usage of computer for schools as well as graduating degrees would not be feasible. We do not have realistic and recent statistics to prove the percentage change in the dropout rate and graduates performances. The author should provide us the number of students in his survey and the subject's used which would help us establish a cause-effect relationship between the tremendous progress and previous declines. Possibly the drastic changes in the dropout ratio and marked performances might be due to active involvement of parents, counseling sessions and training programs. Moreover, there are some subjects like arts and crafts that are learnt by human interaction and observation. It depends on one's creativity and any machine cannot capture the creativity. It can also be inferred that the teachers and staff do not co-operate for the upliftment of the student's performances which might be the reason of earlier decline.
In conclusion, the recommendation that Nova High should spend a greater portion of available funds on the purchase of additional computers and adopt interactive computer instruction throughout the curriculum is ill-founded. In my opinion, the above argument is based on co-incidences .There is no strong evidence that demonstrates the decline in the dropout rate and the impressive performance is due to adoption of interactive computer instruction.
Join the discussion
Source: — GMAT Essays (AWA) |

• Page 1 of 1