BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Please rate analysis of argument-RA

Expert replies
by awdowr » Sat Nov 19, 2011 9:29 am
The following appeared in the health section of a magazine on trends and lifestyles:

"People who use the artificial sweetener aspartame are better off consuming sugar, since aspartame can actually contribute to weight gain rather than weight loss. For example, high levels of aspartame have been shown to trigger a
craving for food by depleting the brain of a chemical that registers satiety, or the sense of being full. Furthermore, studies suggest that sugars, if consumed after at least 45 minutes of continuous exercise, actually enhance the body's ability to burn fat. Consequently, those who drink aspartame-sweetened juices after exercise will also lose this calorie-burning benefit. Thus it appears that people consuming aspartame rather than sugar are unlikely to achieve their dietary goals."

My Essay



In this argument, the author claims a few things about weight loss. The author claims that sugar intake rather than aspartame intake will contribute to ones weight loss. The product Aspartame could actually contribute to weight gain rather than weight loss. In addition, aspartame triggers food craving by depleting a chemical (satiety) that registers a sense of being full. Those who consume sugar after exercising for 45 minutes can actually burn fat than those who consume aspartame juices. Consequently, the author concludes the argument by favoring sugar consumption for weight loss rather than aspartame consumption. Stated in this way, the argument relies on several assumptions for which there's no clear evidence. Therefore, the is argument is weak, unconvincing and has several flaws



To begin with, no statistical data was given on the number of people who used sugar rather than aspartame. Were more people used to conduct the aspartame test than the sugar test? We are not given that information. In addition, were more overweight people used to conduct the aspartame test and less people or the same number of people were used to conduct the sugar test but with average weights.


Second, what if the everyone in the community is not overweight and who watches their food intake rather than their sugar or aspartame intake. These individuals would rather watch the portion of food intake-such as salads, more fiber, and less carbs - than sugar intake.


Third, the author states the aspartame is the only food trigger. Could there be no other food trigger? How about after a long soccer practice or a game that food intake becomes necessary for the body to continue functioning. As always extra curricular sport activities triggers food consumption in all of us that participate in sports.


Finally, the author did not state what levels of aspartame intake contributes to food craving. Could it be one, two or three tea spoons? The author did not provided further information on the levels of aspartame or sugar intake.


In closing, the author's argument is flawed and unconvincing. The argument could have been strengthened if statistical data was provided on the number of people who used sugar and aspartame. Furthermore, the author did not take into consideration food consumption rather the author only concentrated on sugar or aspartame intake. Finally, the author did not say what levels of aspartame contributed to weight gain. With this information an individual would make better healthy conscious decisions.
Join the discussion
Source: — GMAT Essays (AWA) |

by Jim@Grockit » Sun Nov 20, 2011 11:57 pm
Essentially, every Argument essay will be flawed; I think it's better to say that it is incomplete or lacking key evidence. What evidence would be necessary to swing the argument conclusively each way?
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1