BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Please help to crack

Expert replies
by GmatKiss » Fri Sep 02, 2011 11:31 am
I would like to thank whoever it was that wrote that piece of music: it has given me so much pleasure.

A. I would like to thank whoever it was that wrote that piece of music:
B. I would like to thank whomever it was that has written that piece of music:
C. I would like to thank whomever it might be that wrote that piece of music:
D. Whoever it was that wrote that piece of music, I would like to thank because
E. I would like to thank whoever it was that wrote that piece of music,

OA after some discussion
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by force5 » Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:04 pm
A is better than the rest.

D, E are run on's.

music has already been written so Has in B doesnt make sense.

There is no realistic object (whom i would like to thank) Hence whoever is better.
Join the discussion

by cyrwr1 » Fri Sep 02, 2011 5:41 pm
C is my choice
Join the discussion

by champ0007 » Fri Sep 02, 2011 11:44 pm
First, if we are clear about the difference in the usage between "whoever" and "whomever", we can eliminate some options.

I would like to thank whoever/whomever it was that wrote the music
Break up -
I would like to thank him. He wrote that music ( imples Whoever)
I would like thank him. The music was written by him (implies whomever) -- also Passive voice

It might be helpful --> https://www.grammarbook.com/grammar/whoever.asp

Therefore, IMO A
Join the discussion

by aspirant2011 » Sat Sep 03, 2011 12:19 am
GmatKiss wrote:I would like to thank whoever it was that wrote that piece of music: it has given me so much pleasure.

A. I would like to thank whoever it was that wrote that piece of music:
B. I would like to thank whomever it was that has written that piece of music:
C. I would like to thank whomever it might be that wrote that piece of music:
D. Whoever it was that wrote that piece of music, I would like to thank because
E. I would like to thank whoever it was that wrote that piece of music,

OA after some discussion
I agree with Force 5 in his explanation........
Join the discussion

by crick » Sat Sep 03, 2011 7:13 am
Don't we need a semi-colon ( ; ) instead of the colon here ( : ) ?

Crick
Join the discussion

by saketk » Sat Sep 03, 2011 11:33 am
crick wrote:Don't we need a semi-colon ( ; ) instead of the colon here ( : ) ?

Crick
i also think so. why Colon?
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1