BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

please help me #3

Expert replies
by Danielle » Wed Nov 28, 2007 12:27 pm
Regulating is correct, because regulating is not present tense, but is actually the imperfect past tense. They have the same spelling though, so it can look the same. The imperfect is used when an action took place over an extended period of time in the past, as the ordinance did. In fact, it was probably in effect over a number of years. After that, the sentence is a simple test of your knowledge of parallelism as the other verbs should all be in past tense.
Verbal Tutor
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by nobody29 » Wed Nov 28, 2007 3:59 pm
Thank you Danielle,
your explanation is very clear, I think.
Join the discussion

by beingAndNothing » Wed Nov 28, 2007 6:06 pm
Danielle:

Sometimes I get confused as to which verb should be in imperfect sentence.

If the sentence was written as:

A New York City ordinance of 1897 regulated the use of bicycles, mandating a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, requiring cyclists keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, and granting pedestrians right-of-way.

Would this convey a similar meaning as (A) or the past tense of the verb "regulate" mean that ordinance is no longer in effect?

thanks.
Join the discussion

by Danielle » Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:36 am
Okay, I need to correct myself here a bit. What I said about the imperfect tense and its usage is absolutely true, but I realized after looking at this again:

If you'll notice in the correct one (E), the first comma is deleted. It also corrects the sentence by changing 'regulated' to 'regulating'. "Regulating bicycles" is now an adjective phrase describing what the ordinance did, but it is not the verb of the sentence. Mandate, require, and grant are the verbs of the sentence, which is why they are in past tense, because the ordinance is no longer in effect.

That being said, the sentence as you wrote it is grammatically correct and expresses the same meaning -- . You could write it the way you listed and be perfectly fine, but unfortunately your construction wasn't an answer choice. :D
Verbal Tutor
Join the discussion

by Danielle » Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:36 am
Okay, I need to correct myself here a bit. What I said about the imperfect tense and its usage is absolutely true, but I realized after looking at this again:

If you'll notice in the correct one (E), the first comma is deleted. It also corrects the sentence by changing 'regulated' to 'regulating'. "Regulating bicycles" is now an adjective phrase describing what the ordinance did, but it is not the verb of the sentence. Mandate, require, and grant are the verbs of the sentence, which is why they are in past tense, because the ordinance is no longer in effect.

That being said, the sentence as you wrote it is grammatically correct and expresses the same meaning -- . You could write it the way you listed and be perfectly fine, but unfortunately your construction wasn't an answer choice. :D
Verbal Tutor
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1