BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Please guide

Expert replies
by sarthak.agarwal » Fri Sep 26, 2014 7:59 pm
I received the following sentence in an office email:

"Hope this feedback goes into the right department and acted upon."

Is this correct?

Or the correct usage should be "Hope this feedback goes into the right department and IS acted upon."

Please let me know.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by Test Prep Unlimited » Fri Sep 26, 2014 8:49 pm
Yes, the latter is correct--It needs "IS", otherwise if you leave out the "goes into the right department and" it would be like saying "Hope this feedback acted upon." Acted upon what?

TestPrepUnlimited.com
Join the discussion

by David@GMATPrepNow » Sat Sep 27, 2014 6:47 am
Hi sarthak.agarwal,

You are correct that the sentence needs the verb "is" in order to be correct. In addition, while we often see sentences begin with verbs like "hope," it is not strictly correct. It is missing a subject. Who hopes? Here is the complete, correct sentence:

I hope this feedback goes into the right department and is acted upon.

I hope this helps.
Join the discussion

by sarthak.agarwal » Sat Oct 04, 2014 12:30 am
Thank you, David, for the complete correction!

(I hope I used the commas in the correct way)
Join the discussion

by David@GMATPrepNow » Sat Oct 04, 2014 8:18 am
Nice use of commas!

Keep up the good work.

David
Join the discussion

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Sat Oct 04, 2014 10:45 am
I hate to be a stickler, but even the corrected sentence is a bit of a mess. A better sentence would be something like "I hope that this feedback is received and acted upon by the right department."

The key points:

* If we're going to be formal, we have to say "hope that", not simply "hope";
* "Goes into" has two problems: "into" is the wrong preposition (it should be "to"), and "goes" is a questionable verb (when dealing with bureaucracies, you never simply submit anything - it has be acknowledged!)
* Ending a sentence with a preposition ("upon"), even one that's part of a verb, is still taboo among old-fashioned grammarians, and the GMAC is pretty old-fashioned.

That sentence, you don't want to be this formal in a work email! "Hope this finds its way to the right department" is more appropriate in that context, I think.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1