BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Please expaain with reasons

Expert replies
by ssgmatter » Fri Mar 19, 2010 10:54 pm
The Environmental Protection Agency's proposal to place restrictions on both diesel fuel and diesel engines has sparked a counterattack by the oil industry, saying that the move will exacerbate the nation's fuel supply problems.
A. on both diesel fuel and diesel engines has sparked a counterattack by the oil industry, saying
B. on both diesel fuel and engines have sparked the oil industry to counterattack, and they say
C. on both diesel fuel and diesel engines has sparked a counterattack by the oil industry, which says
D. both on diesel fuel and engines has sparked the oil industry to a counterattack, saying
E. both on diesel fuel and diesel engines have sparked the oil industry to counterattack, and it says
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by kstv » Fri Mar 19, 2010 11:50 pm
Proposal is singular so has instead of have.
Restrictions on is better than rectrictions both on - idiomaticatically
Left with A and C.
''saying'' gives the impression that the counterattack was sparked by saying what the oil industry said
C is the best.
there are definite rules of comma ,which and non essential clause.
the clause , saying that the move will exacerbate ..............is not essential and if omitted the Main clause is still a complete sentence.
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Sat Mar 20, 2010 12:33 am
kstv wrote:Proposal is singular so has instead of have.
Restrictions on is better than rectrictions both on - idiomaticatically
Left with A and C.
''saying'' gives the impression that the counterattack was sparked by saying what the oil industry said
C is the best.
there are definite rules of comma ,which and non essential clause.
the clause , saying that the move will exacerbate ..............is not essential and if omitted the Main clause is still a complete sentence.
+1 for C!

Reasoning :

Subject : proposal

verb: Singular : has sparked( Dont use plural verb for a Singular subject. This is one common way of testing errors by GMAC- SV Conflict)

This leads us to A & C eliminating B,D,E.

I Prefer C becox of the usage of "which" a relative pronoun that introduces a " non essential clause". Take care of the comma that is properly placed before "which" and which should be closed as close as possible to the one it "refers" to.

C wins!!

Why not A

here we are looking for a simple present verb rather than a present continuous for of verb type followed by a noun.

C introduces "which" refering directly the oil companies & properly brings in the simple present verb tense(says) rather than "saying".
Last edited by gmatmachoman on Sat Mar 20, 2010 5:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by mj41 » Sat Mar 20, 2010 1:06 am
can someone please elaborate on why A is not correct... I was split between A and C
Join the discussion

by ssgmatter » Sat Mar 20, 2010 5:40 am
Thankyou for the explanation

Can someone please explain what is the problem with A....why A is wrong??

Regards,
Phil
Join the discussion

by mohit11 » Sat Mar 20, 2010 9:09 am
My answer is A

The Environmental Protection Agencyâ's proposal to place restrictions on both diesel fuel and diesel engines has sparked a counterattack by the oil industry, saying that the move will exacerbate the nation’s fuel supply problems.
A. on both diesel fuel and diesel engines has sparked a counterattack by the oil industry, saying - Correct..
B. on both diesel fuel and engines have sparked the oil industry to counterattack, and they say
C. on both diesel fuel and diesel engines has sparked a counterattack by the oil industry, which says (can the oil industry speak?, OUT
D. both on diesel fuel and engines has sparked the oil industry to a counterattack, saying - Construction should be on both and not both on.. OUT
E. both on diesel fuel and diesel engines have sparked the oil industry to counterattack, and it says - Construction should be on both and not both on.. OUT
Join the discussion

by Giorgio » Sat Mar 20, 2010 9:35 am
We need some experts opinion here!
Join the discussion

by kevincanspain » Sat Mar 20, 2010 3:35 pm
Lana ridiculed Laverne, saying that most of the recent agency forecasts were seriously off the mark.

Who said the bolded part, Lana or Laverne?

(clue: Clark's girlfriend)


Lana ridiculed Laverne, who believes that...


(clue: Shirley's roomate in Milwaukee)

You may wish to take issue with an industry saying something, but somebody or something in the sentence is saying something- after all, saying in all the choices- and it certainly isn't the subject of the sentence, the natural referent for a gerund (except for including) after a comma. Accept the fact that the industry is the one saying the the move will... and you should be drawn to C

PS. Don't confuse a gerund with the present continuous tense!
Kevin Armstrong
GMAT Instructor
Gmatclasses
Madrid
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Sat Mar 20, 2010 8:35 pm
kevincanspain wrote:Lana ridiculed Laverne, saying that most of the recent agency forecasts were seriously off the mark.

Who said the bolded part, Lana or Laverne?

(clue: Clark's girlfriend)


Lana ridiculed Laverne, who believes that...


(clue: Shirley's roomate in Milwaukee)

You may wish to take issue with an industry saying something, but somebody or something in the sentence is saying something- after all, saying in all the choices- and it certainly isn't the subject of the sentence, the natural referent for a gerund (except for including) after a comma. Accept the fact that the industry is the one saying the the move will... and you should be drawn to C

PS. Don't confuse a gerund with the present continuous tense!
Kevin,

I did really got confused over gerund & progessive form!
Culd u plz shed some light on how to distinguish them? Any quick ticks that I culd apply?
Join the discussion

by ssgmatter » Sat Mar 20, 2010 9:07 pm
Thanks a heap Kevin for that perfect explanation!.

As pointed out by gmatmachoman could you please shed some light on gerund and progressive form

Regards,
Phil
Join the discussion

by nervesofsteel » Sun Mar 21, 2010 1:57 am
The Environmental Protection Agency's proposal to place restrictions on both diesel fuel and diesel engines has sparked a counterattack by the oil industry, saying that the move will exacerbate the nation's fuel supply problems.


IMO C

the subject of the preceding clause should be modified by "saying"...
So in original sentence it seems as Proposal is saying something..

Instead we mean Oil industries are saying something...this is presented
well in option C

A. on both diesel fuel and diesel engines has sparked a counterattack by the oil industry, saying

C. on both diesel fuel and diesel engines has sparked a counterattack by the oil industry, which says
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1