BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Please could someone assess my Issue Essay

Expert replies

Rate my essay

Poll ended at Wed Aug 04, 2010 10:02 pm

6
0
No votes
5
1
100%
4
0
No votes
3
0
No votes
2
0
No votes
1
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 1

by vijaynarayanan » Fri Jul 30, 2010 11:19 am
Image


According to the author, rather that using the traditional question-and-answer interviews to evaluate job candidates, employers should observe candidates as the perform some of the job's actual tasks. Yet this could be a more elaborate and time consuming process. But nevertheless I strongly agree with the author. I have substantial reasons to support my position.

A few include:

Firstly, the employer gets to access the candidate based on his or her performance on the job. This helps the employer in not only accessing a candidate's expertise, but also in understanding areas of improvement. This could be identified and incorporated in the training needs of the prospective candidate. This is best highlighted in the corporate world where many organizations offer 6-8 week internship to the candidates. Only through on the job performance will the correct candidate be offered a job.

Secondly, the corporate world can take a lesson out of parliamentary democracy. Most leaders start their political career in grass root politics and civic bodies. Based on their performance when they stand for elections, the electorate decides if the candidate had done a good job and is worthy of new elevated position. This is akin to a candidate applying for a job and having to demonstrate how good or bad he or she might be.

Thirdly, it also helps in helping the candidate access what the expectations of his future employer would be. In all fairness, this is a process in which the candidate also gets to better understand his new employer and judge if the offered job is the right one.

Additionally, it helps to strike a balance with existing employees as well. If the prospective candidate is asked to perform some the tasks which existing employees already do it helps bring an air of openness in the organization. It goes to show and demonstrate that competence is what is seen in a new recruit.

Thus, I completely agree with the author that the traditional question-and-answer interviews can be limiting and more often than not does not fully help in judging a candidate. Instead as suggested, by allowing the candidate to perform some actual tasks it will help in better understanding the abilities of the candidate and do a fair assessment.
Join the discussion
Source: — GMAT Essays (AWA) |

by arora007 » Fri Aug 06, 2010 10:28 pm
A few grammatical errors here and there "Yet this could be a more elaborate" "perform some the tasks " " limiting and more often than not does not"

do not deter the writer from putting the point through clearly

A strong opening, a structured set of body sentences, and usage of idioms makes you a candidate of 4.5-5,
I would give u a 5 for this.
https://www.skiponemeal.org/
https://twitter.com/skiponemeal
Few things are impossible to diligence & skill.Great works are performed not by strength,but by perseverance

pm me if you find junk/spam/abusive language, Lets keep our community clean!!
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1