plane tickets online

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 2326
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 am
Thanked: 173 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:710

by gmatmachoman » Sun Jan 17, 2010 9:44 pm
mmslf75 wrote:
papgust wrote:mmslf,

Please don't "quote" a mighty long text. It's too frustrating to keep scrolling the page to read posts.

You could quote specifically if you want to point something.
huh ?!

Then dont scroll simple ;-) , Kidding!!

Will take care in future !! ;-)
Dude..that was funny..

Actually u know wat..we get really frustrated on getting some wrong answers & that gets reflected on some other user for no good reason...

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3225
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 1710 times
Followed by:614 members
GMAT Score:800

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Mon Jan 18, 2010 11:17 am
hk_4u wrote:Hi Stuart

few queries related to this question

1 - the growing number of people who blah blah
VS
the number of people who purchased tickets are growing

My initial impression was that the growing number of people is wrong. Since the question does not tests this, it doesn't really matter. But are both forms correct and acceptable ?
The first version is definitely correct; growing is an adjective that modifies "number", which is perfect.

The second version is fine as long as we change "are" to "is", since "number" is a singular noun when preceded by "the". ("A number of people", on the other hand, is a plural subject.)
2 - usage of the fact that - I have read on a few threads that this usage is always wrong in GMAT , your comments ?
This usage is usually wrong on the GMAT because of how it's used; it's not inherently incorrect, but often turns out to be wrong for modification/agreement reasons on the test (most people use it incorrectly in everyday life, which is why the GMAT models that incorrect usage).
3 - Does the position of "that" really matters ? Again ,I feel it is not really tested as all other options have clear idiom or tense errors .

I feel both these forms are fine

officials are convinced,modifier, that many travelers ...
officials are convinced that ,modifier ,many travelers ...
If the parenthetical phrase (i.e. what's between the commas) is modifying "convinced", then "that" should come after the commas; if the parenthetical phrase is related to what comes after "that", then "that" needs to precede the commas.

Here's an example of when "that" would come after the commas:

"Officials are convinced, as are many members of the public, that the new regulations will be difficult to enforce."

Here's an example of when "that" would precede the commas:

"Officials are convinced that, because of widespread corruption in the system, the new regulations will be difficult to enforce."

Here's another way to think about it: if the part inside the commas and after the commas can stand alone as a sentence, "that" must precede the commas.

In the first example, we'd have: "As are many members of the public, the new regulations will be difficult to enforce." Clearly non-sensical, so "that" goes after the commas.

In the second example, we'd have: "Because of widespread corruption in the system, the new regulations will be difficult to enforce." This sentence does make sense and can stand alone, so "that" precedes the commas.
4 - The method of comparison is new for me. I haven't really seen any other question where 2 clauses are compared in such a way. Is it a common thing to do ?
Not sure what you mean by this last question!
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 79
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 11:16 pm

by hk_4u » Mon Jan 18, 2010 6:19 pm
Wow Stuart ...you rock ...thanks a ton

By point 4 , I meant the style of comparison made in the correct option is new to me

Despite the growing number of people who purchase plane tickets online, airline executives are convinced that, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers to automatic teller machines, many travelers will still use travel agents.

I believe the just as one-third... clause in the sentence is basically as comparison ,and at the same time a subordinate clause too.

What I have usually seen is two parallel phrases/clauses being compared. Could you please explain ?

Is it really a comparison or just a modifier ? I didn't think of it as a modifier since modifiers can usually be removed from the sentence without much loss of meaning , here I felt this phrase is essential to the meaning of the sentence

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Tue Jan 26, 2010 3:06 am
hk_4u wrote:Is it really a comparison or just a modifier ? I didn't think of it as a modifier since modifiers can usually be removed from the sentence without much loss of meaning , here I felt this phrase is essential to the meaning of the sentence
when we say that "modifiers can be removed from the sentence", that's a grammatical statement. it does NOT mean that the meaning of the sentence will always be unchanged with the removal of modifiers! (think about it - if that were the case that modifiers never changed the meaning of the sentence, then there would be no reason for modifiers to exist.)

in general:

* if a modifier is blocked off by commas, then it does not usually change the meaning of the principal clause. (these are called "nonessential" or "nonrestrictive" modifiers.) instead, it's mostly "decoration" - it puts the main clause into a more specific context, or tells additional information about the topic of the main clause.
for instance:
The Kremlin, which is in Moscow, was the seat of the Soviet government.
this sentence doesn't really mean anything different from The Kremlin was the seat of the Soviet government - after all, there was only one Kremlin - but it just gives additional information.

on the other hand,
* if a modifier is NOT blocked off by commas, then it DOES change the meaning of the sentence. (these are called "essential" or "restrictive" modifiers.)
for instance:
Officers will arrest anyone who disrupts the ceremony.
if the modifier is removed, you get Officers will arrest anyone, which is obviously something altogether different.

--

in this case, the modifier is nonrestrictive (blocked off by commas), so, removing it SHOULD NOT affect the meaning of the sentence.
and it doesn't.
viz., without the modifier, the sentence reads as follows:
Despite the growing number of people who purchase plane tickets online, airline executives are convinced that, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers to automatic teller machines, many travelers will still use travel agents.
(note that you have to remove the commas as well, since those belong to the modifier, not to the main clause.)

this clause has EXACTLY the same meaning as the original main clause - there is not one iota of difference.
the only thing that's missing is the context: this sentence doesn't make the analogy that the original sentence makes. but the meaning of the main clause is NOT changed (as should be the case in any sentence with a modifier blocked off by commas).

--

in any case:
in general, subordinate clauses are a type of modifier. if something is a subordinate clause, then it's a modifier.
whether its removal affects the sentence is a function of whether it's restrictive or nonrestrictive (see above), NOT a function of whether it's a modifier in the first place.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 194
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 5:18 am
Thanked: 2 times

by girish3131 » Wed Jan 27, 2010 3:31 am
Stuart Kovinsky wrote:
sulabh wrote:I think A is right.
Despite the growing number of people who purchase plane tickets online, airline executives are convinced that, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers to automatic teller machines, many travelers will still use travel agents.

A. growing number of people who purchase plane tickets online, airline executives are convinced that, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers to automatic teller machines, many travelers will
B. growing number of people who purchase plane tickets online, airline executives are convinced, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers to automatic teller machines, that many travelers would (misplaced)
C. growing number of people purchasing plane tickets online, airline executives are convinced, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers as compared to automatic teller machines, many travelers will (AKWARD and meaning is changed)
D. fact that the number of people purchasing plane tickets online is growing, airline executives are convinced, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers as compared to automatic teller machines, that many travelers would 9misplaced)
E. fact that the number of people who purchase plane tickets online are growing, airline executives are convinced that, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers compared with automatic teller machines, many travelers would

Can we have the OA ?
Great breakdown of the wrong answers! (A) should be the accredited choice.
Hi ,

IN case of B , even if u place " that many travelers would (misplaced) " at correct location still it will be wrong .

B'coz it's saying "CONVINCED" so no chance of using WOULD , which is a indicator of hypothetical condition.
when we are saying convonced then it's better to use WILL in place of WOULD

Thanks!

Please correct me if wrong...

Thanks!

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 194
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 5:18 am
Thanked: 2 times

by girish3131 » Wed Jan 27, 2010 3:33 am
Stuart Kovinsky wrote:
sulabh wrote:I think A is right.
Despite the growing number of people who purchase plane tickets online, airline executives are convinced that, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers to automatic teller machines, many travelers will still use travel agents.

A. growing number of people who purchase plane tickets online, airline executives are convinced that, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers to automatic teller machines, many travelers will
B. growing number of people who purchase plane tickets online, airline executives are convinced, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers to automatic teller machines, that many travelers would (misplaced)
C. growing number of people purchasing plane tickets online, airline executives are convinced, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers as compared to automatic teller machines, many travelers will (AKWARD and meaning is changed)
D. fact that the number of people purchasing plane tickets online is growing, airline executives are convinced, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers as compared to automatic teller machines, that many travelers would 9misplaced)
E. fact that the number of people who purchase plane tickets online are growing, airline executives are convinced that, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers compared with automatic teller machines, many travelers would

Can we have the OA ?
Great breakdown of the wrong answers! (A) should be the accredited choice.
Hi ,

IN case of B , even if u place " that many travelers would (misplaced) " at correct location still it will be wrong .

B'coz it's saying "CONVINCED" so no chance of using WOULD , which is a indicator of hypothetical condition.
when we are saying convonced then it's better to use WILL in place of WOULD

Thanks!

Please correct me if wrong...

Thanks!

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Thu Jan 28, 2010 5:29 am
girish3131 wrote:B'coz it's saying "CONVINCED" so no chance of using WOULD , which is a indicator of hypothetical condition.
when we are saying convonced then it's better to use WILL in place of WOULD

Thanks!

Please correct me if wrong...

Thanks!
you're right in this particular instance, but perhaps not for exactly the reason you've stated.

IN THIS CONTEXT, "would" doesn't make any sense, because the context doesn't satisfy either of the potential requirements for "would":
* conditional (i would VERB under X circumstances)
* past tense of "will" (if X happened, Y would also happen)

--

HOWEVER
it's certainly possible to pair "would" with "convinced".
in fact, you can put "person X is convinced that..." in front of just about any statement in the world.
i.e.
if a meteor were to strike the earth, we would not see sunlight for several days.
--> experts are convinced that, if a meteor were to strike the earth, we would not see sunlight for several days.
notice that the grammar actually isn't any different at all; "experts are convinced that" is a throwaway warm-up clause.
the reason why "would" is perfectly ok, in this case, is that this sentence is CONDITIONAL (one of the two circumstances in which "would" is acceptable, as written above).
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 183
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:13 pm
Location: Greater NYC
Thanked: 14 times

by prinit » Thu Jan 28, 2010 7:57 am
netigen wrote:Despite the growing number of people who purchase plane tickets online, airline executives are convinced that, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers to automatic teller machines, many travelers will still use travel agents.

A. growing number of people who purchase plane tickets online, airline executives are convinced that, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers to automatic teller machines, many travelers will
B. growing number of people who purchase plane tickets online, airline executives are convinced, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers to automatic teller machines, that many travelers would
C. growing number of people purchasing plane tickets online, airline executives are convinced, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers as compared to automatic teller machines, many travelers will
D. fact that the number of people purchasing plane tickets online is growing, airline executives are convinced, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers as compared to automatic teller machines, that many travelers would
E. fact that the number of people who purchase plane tickets online are growing, airline executives are convinced that, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers compared with automatic teller machines, many travelers would

My pick is A.
Correct Idiom usage - Prefer X to Y >> so C,D,E are out.
B. that is misleading

Despite the growing number of people who purchase plane tickets online, airline executives are convinced that, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers to automatic teller machines, many travelers will still use travel agents.

Group modifiers - the tail part of the sentence is correctly modified by the very 1st part

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2009 1:36 am

by jerrykid » Tue Aug 10, 2010 11:47 pm
For choice A, is there anything wrong with the verb "purchase"? I think it should be "purchases" as it follows the phrase "the (growing) number of (people)"?
Beat the GMAT !!!

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Wed Aug 11, 2010 12:21 am
jerrykid wrote:For choice A, is there anything wrong with the verb "purchase"? I think it should be "purchases" as it follows the phrase "the (growing) number of (people)"?
nope. this is context-based -- you have to decide whether the subject of the verb is the number itself (in which case the verb should be singular, since "number" is singular), or the people (in which case the verb should accordingly be plural).

for instance:
the number of people moving to las vegas has been growing every year
--> correct, since it's the actual number that is growing (obviously, the people themselves are not growing).

the number of people who have moved to las vegas in the last 10 years is startlingly high
--> also correct, since this time it's the people who have moved (numbers can't move)

--

in this case, it's the people themselves who are purchasing things (numbers can't purchase things), so the verb should accordingly be plural.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Wed Aug 11, 2010 12:29 am
prinit wrote:
netigen wrote:Despite the growing number of people who purchase plane tickets online, airline executives are convinced that, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers to automatic teller machines, many travelers will still use travel agents.

Group modifiers - the tail part of the sentence is correctly modified by the very 1st part
i think you've made a mistake in choosing your underlined part; the initial part that you have underlined is not a modifier. (if you like to classify things, it's just a noun phrase -- "number" is the noun, modified by the prepositional phrase "of people", which is in turn modified by "who purchase plane tickets online".)

on the other hand, if you underline that entire part, starting with "despite", then that's a subordinate clause which you could classify as a modifier of that last part.
when you have clauses that start with subordinating conjunctions such as "despite" or "because", though, it's generally not that useful to classify them as modifiers, since it's darn near impossible to misplace them. (by contrast, it's extremely important to be able to classify precisely what is being modified by shorter modifiers, such as "which...", because those modifiers are misplaced all the time.)
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron