plane tickets online
-
madhur_ahuja
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 435
- Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 3:55 am
- Thanked: 17 times
-
mmslf75
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 503
- Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 9:53 pm
- Thanked: 31 times
- Followed by:2 members
Firstly,Stuart Kovinsky wrote:Great breakdown of the wrong answers! (A) should be the accredited choice.sulabh wrote:I think A is right.
Despite the growing number of people who purchase plane tickets online, airline executives are convinced that, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers to automatic teller machines, many travelers will still use travel agents.
A. growing number of people who purchase plane tickets online, airline executives are convinced that, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers to automatic teller machines, many travelers will
B. growing number of people who purchase plane tickets online, airline executives are convinced, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers to automatic teller machines, that many travelers would (misplaced)
C. growing number of people purchasing plane tickets online, airline executives are convinced, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers as compared to automatic teller machines, many travelers will (AKWARD and meaning is changed)
D. fact that the number of people purchasing plane tickets online is growing, airline executives are convinced, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers as compared to automatic teller machines, that many travelers would 9misplaced)
E. fact that the number of people who purchase plane tickets online are growing, airline executives are convinced that, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers compared with automatic teller machines, many travelers would
Can we have the OA ?
How can we choose... option containing WILL ..when its know that any thing said in past abt future will take WOULD..
Here, CONVINCED THAT....(past) therefore answer should be B na ???
Secondly, i have read somewhere that its OK to use "comma+that" when the THAT is not addressing the middle modifier or sentence fragment..
i'm looking for a TV that costs less than $200.
you can write
i'm looking for a TV, with a remote, that costs less than $200.
here it appears that there's a "comma + that", but this is mostly an illusion: the comma before "that" isn't actually part of the main structure at all. it's used only to block off the modifier.
https://www.beatthegmat.com/comma-that-n ... 49361.html
- Stuart@KaplanGMAT
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3225
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
- Location: Toronto
- Thanked: 1710 times
- Followed by:614 members
- GMAT Score:800
mmslf75 wrote:I think A is right.
Despite the growing number of people who purchase plane tickets online, airline executives are convinced that, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers to automatic teller machines, many travelers will still use travel agents.
A. growing number of people who purchase plane tickets online, airline executives are convinced that, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers to automatic teller machines, many travelers will
B. growing number of people who purchase plane tickets online, airline executives are convinced, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers to automatic teller machines, that many travelers would (misplaced)
C. growing number of people purchasing plane tickets online, airline executives are convinced, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers as compared to automatic teller machines, many travelers will (AKWARD and meaning is changed)
D. fact that the number of people purchasing plane tickets online is growing, airline executives are convinced, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers as compared to automatic teller machines, that many travelers would 9misplaced)
E. fact that the number of people who purchase plane tickets online are growing, airline executives are convinced that, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers compared with automatic teller machines, many travelers would
It's not the past tense, you ignored the key tense word:Firstly,
How can we choose... option containing WILL ..when its know that any thing said in past abt future will take WOULD..
Here, CONVINCED THAT....(past) therefore answer should be B na ???
"are convinced that"
which makes it the present.
"I am convinced that..."
"He is convinced that..."
"They are convinced that..."
are all in the present tense.
This statement is correct, but that doesn't mean we always should do so; moving around modifiers often changes the meaning of the sentence and since the original is grammatically correct, and makes sense, any answer that changes the meaning is wrong.Secondly, i have read somewhere that its OK to use "comma+that" when the THAT is not addressing the middle modifier or sentence fragment..

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto
Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
-
umaa
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 727
- Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 9:32 pm
- Thanked: 8 times
- Followed by:1 members
E is out - ARE is a wrong antecedent & compared with is wrongmmslf75 wrote:Firstly,Stuart Kovinsky wrote:Great breakdown of the wrong answers! (A) should be the accredited choice.sulabh wrote:I think A is right.
Despite the growing number of people who purchase plane tickets online, airline executives are convinced that, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers to automatic teller machines, many travelers will still use travel agents.
A. growing number of people who purchase plane tickets online, airline executives are convinced that, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers to automatic teller machines, many travelers will
B. growing number of people who purchase plane tickets online, airline executives are convinced, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers to automatic teller machines, that many travelers would (misplaced)
C. growing number of people purchasing plane tickets online, airline executives are convinced, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers as compared to automatic teller machines, many travelers will (AKWARD and meaning is changed)
D. fact that the number of people purchasing plane tickets online is growing, airline executives are convinced, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers as compared to automatic teller machines, that many travelers would 9misplaced)
E. fact that the number of people who purchase plane tickets online are growing, airline executives are convinced that, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers compared with automatic teller machines, many travelers would
Can we have the OA ?
How can we choose... option containing WILL ..when its know that any thing said in past abt future will take WOULD..
Here, CONVINCED THAT....(past) therefore answer should be B na ???
Secondly, i have read somewhere that its OK to use "comma+that" when the THAT is not addressing the middle modifier or sentence fragment..
i'm looking for a TV that costs less than $200.
you can write
i'm looking for a TV, with a remote, that costs less than $200.
here it appears that there's a "comma + that", but this is mostly an illusion: the comma before "that" isn't actually part of the main structure at all. it's used only to block off the modifier.
https://www.beatthegmat.com/comma-that-n ... 49361.html
B, C and D are out: "airline executives are convinced, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers as compared to automatic teller machines" - Changes the meaning
What we think, we become
-
mmslf75
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 503
- Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 9:53 pm
- Thanked: 31 times
- Followed by:2 members
Stuart Kovinsky wrote:mmslf75 wrote:I think A is right.
Despite the growing number of people who purchase plane tickets online, airline executives are convinced that, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers to automatic teller machines, many travelers will still use travel agents.
A. growing number of people who purchase plane tickets online, airline executives are convinced that, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers to automatic teller machines, many travelers will
B. growing number of people who purchase plane tickets online, airline executives are convinced, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers to automatic teller machines, that many travelers would (misplaced)
C. growing number of people purchasing plane tickets online, airline executives are convinced, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers as compared to automatic teller machines, many travelers will (AKWARD and meaning is changed)
D. fact that the number of people purchasing plane tickets online is growing, airline executives are convinced, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers as compared to automatic teller machines, that many travelers would 9misplaced)
E. fact that the number of people who purchase plane tickets online are growing, airline executives are convinced that, just as one-third of bank customers still prefer human tellers compared with automatic teller machines, many travelers wouldIt's not the past tense, you ignored the key tense word:Firstly,
How can we choose... option containing WILL ..when its know that any thing said in past abt future will take WOULD..
Here, CONVINCED THAT....(past) therefore answer should be B na ???
"are convinced that"
which makes it the present.
"I am convinced that..."
"He is convinced that..."
"They are convinced that..."
are all in the present tense.
This statement is correct, but that doesn't mean we always should do so; moving around modifiers often changes the meaning of the sentence and since the original is grammatically correct, and makes sense, any answer that changes the meaning is wrong.Secondly, i have read somewhere that its OK to use "comma+that" when the THAT is not addressing the middle modifier or sentence fragment..
But then
"are convinced that" also contains, CONVINCED which is past right ?
- Stuart@KaplanGMAT
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3225
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
- Location: Toronto
- Thanked: 1710 times
- Followed by:614 members
- GMAT Score:800
No... to be honest, I don't know what the official grammatical terminology is (you never need to know technical language for the GMAT!), but even though "convinced" sounds like the past, it's not.mmslf75 wrote:"are convinced that" also contains, CONVINCED which is past right ?
I was convinced;
I am convinced;and
I will be convinced
are examples of the past, present and future, respectively, but all use "convinced" as part of the construction.
There are other words that work the same way, such as "tired" and "reduced"; what they all have in common is that they describe states of being and require the verb "to be" first. The form of the verb "to be" that you use determines the tense of the action.

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto
Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
-
mmslf75
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 503
- Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 9:53 pm
- Thanked: 31 times
- Followed by:2 members
Ok...Stuart Kovinsky wrote:No... to be honest, I don't know what the official grammatical terminology is (you never need to know technical language for the GMAT!), but even though "convinced" sounds like the past, it's not.mmslf75 wrote:"are convinced that" also contains, CONVINCED which is past right ?
I was convinced;
I am convinced;and
I will be convinced
are examples of the past, present and future, respectively, but all use "convinced" as part of the construction.
There are other words that work the same way, such as "tired" and "reduced"; what they all have in common is that they describe states of being and require the verb "to be" first. The form of the verb "to be" that you use determines the tense of the action.
By saying TO BE VERBS u mean basic forms of VERBS ??
Can u give examples please!!
- Stuart@KaplanGMAT
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3225
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
- Location: Toronto
- Thanked: 1710 times
- Followed by:614 members
- GMAT Score:800
Umm.. I just gave a bunch of examples... heh.mmslf75 wrote:Ok...Stuart Kovinsky wrote:No... to be honest, I don't know what the official grammatical terminology is (you never need to know technical language for the GMAT!), but even though "convinced" sounds like the past, it's not.mmslf75 wrote:"are convinced that" also contains, CONVINCED which is past right ?
I was convinced;
I am convinced;and
I will be convinced
are examples of the past, present and future, respectively, but all use "convinced" as part of the construction.
There are other words that work the same way, such as "tired" and "reduced"; what they all have in common is that they describe states of being and require the verb "to be" first. The form of the verb "to be" that you use determines the tense of the action.
By saying TO BE VERBS u mean basic forms of VERBS ??
Can u give examples please!!
I was tired/I am tired/I will be tired.
Taxes were reduced/Taxes are reduced/Taxes will be reduced.
He was convinced/He is convinced/He will be convinced.
In all of those cases, the part of the sentence that you're thinking of as a verb ("tired", "reduced", "convinced") is actually the object of the verb "to be", in much the same way "happy" is the object of "to be" in the sentence "He is happy".
So, the action in all of those sentences is "being" and the following word ("tired", "reduced", "convinced") is simply what you are being, not when you are being it.

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto
Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
-
mmslf75
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 503
- Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 9:53 pm
- Thanked: 31 times
- Followed by:2 members
Oh..thanks Stuart...kinda got confused w.r.t TO BE ..Verbs..Stuart Kovinsky wrote:Umm.. I just gave a bunch of examples... heh.mmslf75 wrote:Ok...Stuart Kovinsky wrote:No... to be honest, I don't know what the official grammatical terminology is (you never need to know technical language for the GMAT!), but even though "convinced" sounds like the past, it's not.mmslf75 wrote:"are convinced that" also contains, CONVINCED which is past right ?
I was convinced;
I am convinced;and
I will be convinced
are examples of the past, present and future, respectively, but all use "convinced" as part of the construction.
There are other words that work the same way, such as "tired" and "reduced"; what they all have in common is that they describe states of being and require the verb "to be" first. The form of the verb "to be" that you use determines the tense of the action.
By saying TO BE VERBS u mean basic forms of VERBS ??
Can u give examples please!!
I was tired/I am tired/I will be tired.
Taxes were reduced/Taxes are reduced/Taxes will be reduced.
He was convinced/He is convinced/He will be convinced.
In all of those cases, the part of the sentence that you're thinking of as a verb ("tired", "reduced", "convinced") is actually the object of the verb "to be", in much the same way "happy" is the object of "to be" in the sentence "He is happy".
So, the action in all of those sentences is "being" and the following word ("tired", "reduced", "convinced") is simply what you are being, not when you are being it.
-
mmslf75
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 503
- Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 9:53 pm
- Thanked: 31 times
- Followed by:2 members
Look at this one
https://www.beatthegmat.com/in-contrast- ... tml#211109
Topic: In contrast to
Wed Aug 19, 2009 4:10 am
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In contrast to environmentalists proposals to limit emissions of certain pollutants, the administration proposed calling for mandatory restrictions of only three such pollutants from power plants-mercury, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen oxides-and the plan would delay such cuts until 2010 or later.
A. administration proposed calling for mandatory restriction of
B. administration proposed a call for mandatory restrictions, including those for
C. administration, proposing mandatory restrictions on
D. administration's proposal was a call for mandatory restrictions, which include
E. administration's proposal would call for mandatory restrictions on
Here OA is E
Why WOULD Is used.. we do not have past to future refernt here !!
https://www.beatthegmat.com/in-contrast- ... tml#211109
Topic: In contrast to
Wed Aug 19, 2009 4:10 am
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In contrast to environmentalists proposals to limit emissions of certain pollutants, the administration proposed calling for mandatory restrictions of only three such pollutants from power plants-mercury, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen oxides-and the plan would delay such cuts until 2010 or later.
A. administration proposed calling for mandatory restriction of
B. administration proposed a call for mandatory restrictions, including those for
C. administration, proposing mandatory restrictions on
D. administration's proposal was a call for mandatory restrictions, which include
E. administration's proposal would call for mandatory restrictions on
Here OA is E
Why WOULD Is used.. we do not have past to future refernt here !!
GMAT/MBA Expert
- lunarpower
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
- Thanked: 2256 times
- Followed by:1535 members
- GMAT Score:800
yeah.Stuart Kovinsky wrote:Umm.. I just gave a bunch of examples... heh.mmslf75 wrote:Ok...Stuart Kovinsky wrote:No... to be honest, I don't know what the official grammatical terminology is (you never need to know technical language for the GMAT!), but even though "convinced" sounds like the past, it's not.mmslf75 wrote:"are convinced that" also contains, CONVINCED which is past right ?
I was convinced;
I am convinced;and
I will be convinced
are examples of the past, present and future, respectively, but all use "convinced" as part of the construction.
There are other words that work the same way, such as "tired" and "reduced"; what they all have in common is that they describe states of being and require the verb "to be" first. The form of the verb "to be" that you use determines the tense of the action.
By saying TO BE VERBS u mean basic forms of VERBS ??
Can u give examples please!!
I was tired/I am tired/I will be tired.
Taxes were reduced/Taxes are reduced/Taxes will be reduced.
He was convinced/He is convinced/He will be convinced.
In all of those cases, the part of the sentence that you're thinking of as a verb ("tired", "reduced", "convinced") is actually the object of the verb "to be", in much the same way "happy" is the object of "to be" in the sentence "He is happy".
So, the action in all of those sentences is "being" and the following word ("tired", "reduced", "convinced") is simply what you are being, not when you are being it.
in fact, stuart is basically just giving you a summary of the passive voice.
that's all these verbs are: passive verbs.
i was convinced --> past, passive
i had been convinced --> past perfect, passive
i am convinced --> present, passive
i have been convinced --> present perfect, passive
i would be convinced --> conditional, passive
(it is important that) i be convinced --> subjunctive, passive
etc.
etc.
these verbs can take every tense that's possible for normal "active" verbs.
--
in any case:
if you see
studies have shown that...
X said that...
people believe that...
X has found that...
etc.
these are just "WARMUPS" and can be completely ignored in any treatment of the grammar of the sentence.
they don't even affect verb tense:
studies have found that X happened
studies have found that X currently happens
studies have found that X will happen
studies have found that X had happened (before Y happened)
studies have found that X has happened
studies have found that X would have happened (if Y had happened)
etc.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
-
mmslf75
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 503
- Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 9:53 pm
- Thanked: 31 times
- Followed by:2 members
Ron,lunarpower wrote:yeah.Stuart Kovinsky wrote:Umm.. I just gave a bunch of examples... heh.mmslf75 wrote:Ok...Stuart Kovinsky wrote:No... to be honest, I don't know what the official grammatical terminology is (you never need to know technical language for the GMAT!), but even though "convinced" sounds like the past, it's not.mmslf75 wrote:"are convinced that" also contains, CONVINCED which is past right ?
I was convinced;
I am convinced;and
I will be convinced
are examples of the past, present and future, respectively, but all use "convinced" as part of the construction.
There are other words that work the same way, such as "tired" and "reduced"; what they all have in common is that they describe states of being and require the verb "to be" first. The form of the verb "to be" that you use determines the tense of the action.
By saying TO BE VERBS u mean basic forms of VERBS ??
Can u give examples please!!
I was tired/I am tired/I will be tired.
Taxes were reduced/Taxes are reduced/Taxes will be reduced.
He was convinced/He is convinced/He will be convinced.
In all of those cases, the part of the sentence that you're thinking of as a verb ("tired", "reduced", "convinced") is actually the object of the verb "to be", in much the same way "happy" is the object of "to be" in the sentence "He is happy".
So, the action in all of those sentences is "being" and the following word ("tired", "reduced", "convinced") is simply what you are being, not when you are being it.
in fact, stuart is basically just giving you a summary of the passive voice.
that's all these verbs are: passive verbs.
i was convinced --> past, passive
i had been convinced --> past perfect, passive
i am convinced --> present, passive
i have been convinced --> present perfect, passive
i would be convinced --> conditional, passive
(it is important that) i be convinced --> subjunctive, passive
etc.
etc.
these verbs can take every tense that's possible for normal "active" verbs.
--
in any case:
if you see
studies have shown that...
X said that...
people believe that...
X has found that...
etc.
these are just "WARMUPS" and can be completely ignored in any treatment of the grammar of the sentence.
they don't even affect verb tense:
studies have found that X happened
studies have found that X currently happens
studies have found that X will happen
studies have found that X had happened (before Y happened)
studies have found that X has happened
studies have found that X would have happened (if Y had happened)
etc.
STUDIES HAVE FOUND... is undoubtedly PRESENT PERFECT TENSE right??
Then how can we "ignore" them as just "WARMUPS"???
-
mmslf75
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 503
- Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 9:53 pm
- Thanked: 31 times
- Followed by:2 members
huh ?!papgust wrote:mmslf,
Please don't "quote" a mighty long text. It's too frustrating to keep scrolling the page to read posts.
You could quote specifically if you want to point something.
Then dont scroll simple
Will take care in future !!
Hi Stuart
few queries related to this question
1 - the growing number of people who blah blah
VS
the number of people who purchased tickets are growing
My initial impression was that the growing number of people is wrong. Since the question does not tests this, it doesn't really matter. But are both forms correct and acceptable ?
2 - usage of the fact that - I have read on a few threads that this usage is always wrong in GMAT , your comments ?
3 - Does the position of "that" really matters ? Again ,I feel it is not really tested as all other options have clear idiom or tense errors .
I feel both these forms are fine
officials are convinced,modifier, that many travelers ...
officials are convinced that ,modifier ,many travelers ...
4 - The method of comparison is new for me. I haven't really seen any other question where 2 clauses are compared in such a way. Is it a common thing to do ?
few queries related to this question
1 - the growing number of people who blah blah
VS
the number of people who purchased tickets are growing
My initial impression was that the growing number of people is wrong. Since the question does not tests this, it doesn't really matter. But are both forms correct and acceptable ?
2 - usage of the fact that - I have read on a few threads that this usage is always wrong in GMAT , your comments ?
3 - Does the position of "that" really matters ? Again ,I feel it is not really tested as all other options have clear idiom or tense errors .
I feel both these forms are fine
officials are convinced,modifier, that many travelers ...
officials are convinced that ,modifier ,many travelers ...
4 - The method of comparison is new for me. I haven't really seen any other question where 2 clauses are compared in such a way. Is it a common thing to do ?












