BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

piracy

Expert replies
by ketkoag » Wed May 13, 2009 8:49 am
While some propose to combat widespread illegal copying of computer programs by attempting to change people's attitudes toward pirating, others by suggesting reducing software prices to decrease the incentive for pirating, and still others by calling for the prosecution of those who copy software illegally.

(A) by suggesting reducing software prices to decrease the incentive for pirating, and still others by calling

(B) by suggesting the reduction of software prices to decrease the incentive for pirating, and still others call

(C) suggest the reduction of software prices for decreasing the incentive for pirating, and still others call

(D) suggest the reduction of software prices to decrease the incentive for pirating, and still others by calling

(E) suggest reducing software prices to decrease the incentive for pirating, and still others are calling

why not C is the right answer?
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Re: piracy

by KICKGMATASS123 » Wed May 13, 2009 9:03 am
Idiom is To Decrease not For Decrease
IMO D

What's the OA and Source?
Join the discussion

by ketkoag » Wed May 13, 2009 9:28 am
[spoiler]I'm afraid D is not the right answer. Its from 1000 set[/spoiler]
OA after few posts. :)
Join the discussion

by sudeep_ar » Wed May 13, 2009 9:34 am
IMO..A

Parallelism

use of by gerund
Join the discussion

by tdadic84 » Wed May 13, 2009 9:36 am
IMO B
Join the discussion

by blackarrow » Wed May 13, 2009 9:46 am
IMO E

Funny that we have almost all options as probable IMO's here!

Please post OA
Its better to burn out than to fade away
Join the discussion

by ketkoag » Wed May 13, 2009 9:58 am
blackarrow wrote:IMO E

Funny that we have almost all options as probable IMO's here!

Please post OA
u r right.....Please post ur reasoning as well..
Join the discussion

by PAB2706 » Thu May 14, 2009 7:29 am
IMO E

some propose......others suggest parallel

eliminate A and B

to change... to decrease parallel

eliminate C

others are is active and right subject verb agreement.

eliminate D

thus E
Join the discussion

by gauravgundal » Thu May 14, 2009 9:52 am
from some other forum


(A) by suggesting reducing software prices to decrease the incentive for pirating, and still others by calling ---->while... by..., and by... ---> there are only subordinate pharses, the main clause is missing
some propose..., others (no verb), and still others (no verb)

(B) by suggesting the reduction of software prices to decrease the incentive for pirating, and still others call other is dagling, its main predicate is missing
some propose..., others (no verb) by suggesting.... for the ... illegally. (the first clause is ok, but after a comma, there is no valuable components.

(C) suggest the reduction of software prices for decreasing the incentive for pirating, and still others call For decreasing ---> to express purpose, use to decrease
some propose.. , others suggest..., and others call --> ok, but
to infinitive is better fit to express purpose.

(D) suggest the reduction of software prices to decrease the incentive for pirating, and still others by calling reducing is better than the reduction --> verbs rules over nouns
some propose...., others suggest...., and still others (no verb) out

(E) suggest reducing software prices to decrease the incentive for pirating, and still others are calling
some propose..., others suggest..., and still others are...
(all verbs are present and three clauses are parallel in terms of format)
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1