BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

PHOTO

Expert replies
by sogmat » Tue Apr 14, 2009 6:14 pm
Every photograph, because it involves the light rays that something emits hitting film, must in some obvious sense be true. But because it could always have been made to show things differently than it does, it cannot express the whole truth and, in that sense, is false. Therefore, nothing can ever be definitively proved with a photograph.
Which one of the following is an assumption that would permit the conclusion above to be properly drawn?
(A) Whatever is false in the sense that it cannot express the whole truth cannot furnish definitive proof.
(B) The whole truth cannot be known.
(C) It is not possible to determine the truthfulness of a photograph in any sense.
(D) It is possible to use a photograph as corroborative evidence if there is additional evidence establishing the truth about the scene photographed.
(E) If something is being photographed, then it is possible to prove definitively the truth about it.

OA -A
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by delhiboy1979 » Tue Apr 14, 2009 11:12 pm
Between A and D I pick A because D goes partly out of scope with using photographs as corroborative evidence.
Join the discussion

A would be correct

The Premise is the photo cannot express the whole truth and, in that sense, is false. The conclusion based on this premise makes sense that whatever is false in the sense that it cannot express the truth, cannot furnish definitive proof.

B is wrong

C is wrong

D is irrelevant as there is no mention about how the photo used as evidence and additional factors are being introduced which suggest it as a causal flaw. There is no flaw, the question is asking for the conclusion

E is completely opposite of what is being said in paragraph about photography. "There is no truth about it."
Regards,
Arvind
Join the discussion

mharv wrote:A would be correct

The Premise is the photo cannot express the whole truth and, in that sense, is false. The conclusion based on this premise makes sense that whatever is false in the sense that it cannot express the truth, cannot furnish definitive proof.

B is wrong

C is wrong

D is irrelevant as there is no mention about how the photo used as evidence and additional factors are being introduced which suggest it as a causal flaw. There is no flaw, the question is asking for the conclusion

E is completely opposite of what is being said in paragraph about photography. "There is no truth about it."
Why C is wrong?

If we negate C then Conclusion gets weakened.

C. It is not possible to determine the truthfulness of a photograph in any sense

Negation: It is possible to determine the truthfulness of a photograph in any sense

and conclusion : Therefore, nothing can ever be definitively proved with a photograph.

Am I missing something here?

Cheers
Piyush
Join the discussion

piyush_nitt wrote: Why C is wrong?

If we negate C then Conclusion gets weakened.

C. It is not possible to determine the truthfulness of a photograph in any sense

Negation: It is possible to determine the truthfulness of a photograph in any sense

and conclusion : Therefore, nothing can ever be definitively proved with a photograph.

Am I missing something here?

Cheers
Piyush
C is wrong because it is too extreme and the same reason holds good for B.
Reasoning for D and E has already been provided above.

The conclusion states, nothing can ever be definitely proved with a photograph.
The word definitive is key here.
A correctly follows this track to say that if something is false, because it does not express the whole truth, then it cannot be treated as definitive proof. It hence ties Stmt#2 and Stmt#3 in the argument, together.
Join the discussion

by krisraam » Wed Apr 15, 2009 10:56 am
IMO A.

The conclusion "Nothing can definitely be proven with a photograph" is properly drawn if we assume that "The false part a photograph has is enough that it can;t form a definitive proof"

Thanks
Raama
Join the discussion

by mikeCoolBoy » Thu Apr 16, 2009 4:55 am
IMO C

because it could always have been made to show things differently than it does therefore nothing can ever be definitively proved with a photograph.

from my point of view if we negate C the argument falls apart [/b]
Join the discussion

by samanthaJ79 » Sun May 15, 2016 4:46 am
I will go with option A
Join the discussion