BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Philological Society

Expert replies
by Deepthi Subbu » Thu Oct 06, 2011 7:47 am
In 1860, the Philological Society launched its effort to create a dictionary more comprehensive than the world had ever seen; although the project would take more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary had been born.

a.would take more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary had been
b.took more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary was
c.would take more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary was being
d.would take more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary was
e.took more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary was about to be
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by HSPA » Thu Oct 06, 2011 8:02 am
I am stuck btw D and B.. my guess is D>B, but is the sentence complete? Are you sure you havent missed the ending words?
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Join the discussion

by Neo Anderson » Thu Oct 06, 2011 8:24 am
A: incorrect; cant be 'Had been born'
B: incorrect; as it appears 'that OED was born after completion of the project' (after 60 years); however the intention of the author is 'that OED was born as the effort started'.
C: incorrect; cant be 'was being born'
D: correct; use of would (refering future w.r.t past)and 'OED was born' (simple past)appears to be correct
E: incorrect; cant be 'was about to be born'

IMO: D is correct
Join the discussion

by Deepthi Subbu » Thu Oct 06, 2011 9:21 am
Neo Anderson wrote:A: incorrect; cant be 'Had been born'
B: incorrect; as it appears 'that OED was born after completion of the project' (after 60 years); however the intention of the author is 'that OED was born as the effort started'.
C: incorrect; cant be 'was being born'
D: correct; use of would (refering future w.r.t past)and 'OED was born' (simple past)appears to be correct
E: incorrect; cant be 'was about to be born'

IMO: D is correct
Your answer is definitely correct . But I was stuck between B and D. The action of launching - launched happened in the past and hence the efforts taken for launching also also should have taken in the past . In D ,doesn't would take point to a future activity when the project is supposed to happen immediately ?
Join the discussion

by Proleefeek » Thu Oct 06, 2011 9:27 am
Deepthi Subbu wrote:In 1860, the Philological Society launched its effort to create a dictionary more comprehensive than the world had ever seen; although the project would take more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary had been born.

a.would take more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary had been
b.took more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary was
c.would take more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary was being
d.would take more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary was
e.took more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary was about to be
I would go with 'b' simply because usually Future in Past verb (would take) is not coupled with time clauses like more than 60 years. A simple past is more preferable for these situations. BTW whats the OA?
Join the discussion

by GmatKiss » Thu Oct 06, 2011 9:33 am
In 1860, the Philological Society launched its effort to create a dictionary more comprehensive than the world had ever seen; although the project would take more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary had been born.

b.took more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary was borne.took more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary was about to be born

IMO:B
Join the discussion

by Deepthi Subbu » Thu Oct 06, 2011 10:34 am
Assuming all these , I marked b;however the correct answer is D
Join the discussion

by phoenix111 » Thu Oct 06, 2011 10:49 am
IMO :C.
I think C is better because they were in the process of creating the most comprehendsive dictionary.
So it should be -> was being born.

It seems the OA is B, what's the explaination for C??
Join the discussion

by sl750 » Thu Oct 06, 2011 11:15 am
Isn't the semi colon used to separate two independent clauses? the use of although starts a subordinate clause. Is that correct?
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1