Pets + happiness

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 238
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 8:44 am
Thanked: 9 times

Pets + happiness

by avenus » Mon Aug 17, 2009 11:31 am
..
Attachments
CR_1.JPG

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 393
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:18 pm
Location: Chicago
Thanked: 8 times

by riteshbindal » Mon Aug 17, 2009 11:45 am
D IMO. OA plz

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 63
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 11:48 am
GMAT Score:730

by rainmaker » Mon Aug 17, 2009 12:15 pm
I will go with A.

What's the OA?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 238
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 8:44 am
Thanked: 9 times

by avenus » Tue Aug 18, 2009 3:45 am
bets still accepted...

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 21
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 9:54 pm
Location: Hyderabad

Re: Pets + happiness

by Gopi » Tue Aug 18, 2009 4:55 am
avenus wrote:..
my choice is D

As this shows that people are happy because they have pets which implies that people won't be happy if they don't have pets.

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009 5:47 am
Thanked: 1 times

by lalitkc » Tue Aug 18, 2009 6:10 am
Answer is E.
If all the people who dont have pets feel unhappy (sometimes) then it means that they would have been happIER if they had pets. This disproves the conclusion in the arguement that one would be as happy as possible if he did not have pets.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 208
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 11:32 am
Location: Mumbai
Thanked: 2 times

Re: Pets + happiness

by vikram_k51 » Tue Aug 18, 2009 6:25 am
avenus wrote:..
Will go with E

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 238
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 8:44 am
Thanked: 9 times

by avenus » Tue Aug 18, 2009 11:00 pm
OA D

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 52
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 3:20 am

by Eric77Gorm » Mon May 16, 2016 12:15 am
I like the explanation on E.