BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Peter's best time in swimming. Wrong soln from Kaplan?

Expert replies
by dacii » Thu Mar 26, 2009 5:02 pm
Ladies and gentelmen, this is a Kaplan question. I suspect the the solution is wrong. Do you agree?

Before Race R, Peter's best time in swimming was 21 minutes. Did Peter beat this time in Race R ?

(1) Peter took between 0.3 and 0.4 hours to swim 1,500 meters in Race R.
(2) Peter took between 1,200 and 1,300 seconds to swim 1,500 meters in Race R.

Kaplan Solution:

The question asks whether P (Peter's most recent time) is anything less (i.e., faster) than 21 minutes. Statements (1) and (2) give bounded ranges of possible values for P. Some computation will be necessary to see ifthe statements can be used to show definitely whether P " 21. Your calculations will involve conversions, because the statements are
made in terms of hours and seconds, while the question stem uses minutes.

Statement (1) tells you that (0.3 x 60) < p < (0.4 x 60). P is therefore between 18 and 24 minutes - but that doesn't tell you if it was
less than 21 minutes. To change seconds to minutes, divide by 60, so Statement (2) becomes 1200/60 < p < 1300/60, or 20 < P < 21 2/3. Neither statement alone tells you if p < 21, nor can you get any farther by putting the two statements together.

Well, the problem with the solution ... the record is 21 minutes for how many miles?!

d
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by cramya » Thu Mar 26, 2009 5:11 pm
imo Its a clear E.

The problem could have said for 1500 miles the time is 21 minutes.

What is that u dont agree with the solution? Could u pl help me understand better?


Regards,
CR
Join the discussion

by dacii » Thu Mar 26, 2009 5:17 pm
cramya thanks for your reply.

If it is 21 mins for 1500 miles the solution is good.
If it is 21 mins for 1 mile the solution is A.
If it is 21 mins for 5000 miles the solution is A.

The problem never states that it is 21 mins for 1500 miles. And we are supposed to never assume. So the solution is E because you don't know how many miles was the record race.

Am I missing something?

(PS what is imo?)
Join the discussion

by cramya » Thu Mar 26, 2009 5:59 pm
IMO->In my opinion

Agree 1500 could have been specified.

Regards,
CR
Join the discussion