BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Permutation and combination

Expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sun Jan 26, 2014 8:38 am
parveen110 wrote:Find the number of non-negative integral solutions of 2x+2y+z=10.

a. 12C2
b. 14C4
c. 11C2
d. None of these
Hi Praveen,

This question is beyond the scope of the GMAT.
What's the source?
By the way, I noticed that you have posted only counting questions so far. Are you, by any chance, taking a Combinatorics class? :-)

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by parveen110 » Sun Jan 26, 2014 10:14 am
Hi Brent,

Yes, this question is out-of-scope of GMAT. But i solve these questions only for the clarity of concepts on the topic. And of course, through this forum i may get to know the neat and purely concept-based approach to these problems because of expertise of instructors like you. I have read your posts on combinatorics. There are a lot many takeaways. But a lot of confusion remains.

And no i am not taking any class on combinatorics:) Just trying to solve on my own. This forum is really helpful.

The source of this problem is some book on aptitude that i found in a library:)
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sun Jan 26, 2014 10:24 am
Okay, fair enough.
I'm just concerned that students will see questions like these and begin worrying that they are not adequately prepared for the GMAT when, in fact, they will never see a question like this on the GMAT.

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Jan 29, 2014 1:21 pm
parveen110 wrote:Find the number of non-negative integral solutions of 2x+2y+z=10.

a. 12C2
b. 14C4
c. 11C2
d. None of these
This problem can be solved without high-level combinatorics.

z = 10 - 2x - 2y = even - even - even = even.
Thus, z is even.

Plug in even values for z such that 0≤z≤10 and count the number of options for x and y.
Note the following:
2x + 2y = 10-z
x+y = (10-z)/2.

Case 1: z=10
x+y = (10-10)/2 = 0.
Options for (x,y):
x=0, y=0.
Total options = 1.

Case 2: z=8
x+y = (10-8)/2 = 1.
Options for (x,y):
x=0, y=1
x=1, y=0.
Total options = 2.

Case 3: z=6
x+y = (10-6)/2 = 2.
Options for (x,y):
x=0, y=2
x=1, y=1
x=2, y=0.
Total options = 3.

Notice the PATTERN:
With every case, the number of options for (x.y) increases by 1.
Thus:
z=4 --> 4 options
z=2 --> 5 options
z=0 --> 6 options.

Adding the values in red, we get:
Total options = 1+2+3+4+5+6 = 21.

The correct answer is D.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by parveen110 » Wed Jan 29, 2014 7:10 pm
GMATGuruNY wrote:
parveen110 wrote:Find the number of non-negative integral solutions of 2x+2y+z=10.

a. 12C2
b. 14C4
c. 11C2
d. None of these
This problem can be solved without high-level combinatorics.

z = 10 - 2x - 2y = even - even - even = even.
Thus, z is even.

Plug in even values for z such that 0≤z≤10 and count the number of options for x and y.
Note the following:
2x + 2y = 10-z
x+y = (10-z)/2.

Case 1: z=10
x+y = (10-10)/2 = 0.
Options for (x,y):
x=0, y=0.
Total options = 1.

Case 2: z=8
x+y = (10-8)/2 = 1.
Options for (x,y):
x=0, y=1
x=1, y=0.
Total options = 2.

Case 3: z=6
x+y = (10-6)/2 = 2.
Options for (x,y):
x=0, y=2
x=1, y=1
x=2, y=0.
Total options = 3.

Notice the PATTERN:
With every case, the number of options for (x.y) increases by 1.
Thus:
z=4 --> 4 options
z=2 --> 5 options
z=0 --> 6 options.

Adding the values in red, we get:
Total options = 1+2+3+4+5+6 = 21.

The correct answer is D.
w0w!! That's really cool Mitch, thanks:)
Join the discussion