Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Percentages !!`

Expert replies
by vishubn » Sun Dec 14, 2008 1:19 am
If Jack’s and Kate’s annual salaried in 1985 were each 10 percent higher than their respective annual salaries in 1984, what was Jack’s annual salary in 1984?
(1) The sum of Jack’s and Kate’s annual salaries in 1984 was $50,000.
(2) The sum of Jack’s and Kate’s annual salaries in 1985 was $55,000.


My appp

A) j + k=50000

Insuff

B) 1.1j+1.1k=55000

together

Possible!! But Oa is Wrong it says E

any comments
KILL !! DIE !! or BEAT my FEAR !!! de@D END!!
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by vittalgmat » Sun Dec 14, 2008 1:39 am
Vishubn
U almost got the correct solution... but fell into the classic
2 eqn 2 variable trap.

Stmt 1: j + k = 50k

insufficient.


stmt 2:
in 1985, each of their salaries were 10% more than their
corresponding prev yr salaries.

so
1.1j + 1.1k = 55k
=> 1.1(j+k) = 55k
=> j +k = 50k

insufficient.


combining them.
Both equations are identical.
hence no unique solutions.

therefore E

Here is the takeaway from this (from one of Ron/Stuart's comments)

The real "rule" in mathematics is this: If you have n *independent* *linear* equations and n unknowns, you can solve for all n of your unknowns. By "independent", we mean that you can't derive any one equation from the others.
Join the discussion

by 720dreaming » Sun Dec 14, 2008 1:43 am
yup, gotta watch out for those!
Join the discussion

by vishubn » Sun Dec 14, 2008 4:46 am
Damn :) !! laziness ! do cost crazy !!

thanks guys

vishu
KILL !! DIE !! or BEAT my FEAR !!! de@D END!!
Join the discussion