BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Percentages !!`

Expert replies
by vishubn » Sun Dec 14, 2008 1:19 am
If Jack’s and Kate’s annual salaried in 1985 were each 10 percent higher than their respective annual salaries in 1984, what was Jack’s annual salary in 1984?
(1) The sum of Jack’s and Kate’s annual salaries in 1984 was $50,000.
(2) The sum of Jack’s and Kate’s annual salaries in 1985 was $55,000.


My appp

A) j + k=50000

Insuff

B) 1.1j+1.1k=55000

together

Possible!! But Oa is Wrong it says E

any comments
KILL !! DIE !! or BEAT my FEAR !!! de@D END!!
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by vittalgmat » Sun Dec 14, 2008 1:39 am
Vishubn
U almost got the correct solution... but fell into the classic
2 eqn 2 variable trap.

Stmt 1: j + k = 50k

insufficient.


stmt 2:
in 1985, each of their salaries were 10% more than their
corresponding prev yr salaries.

so
1.1j + 1.1k = 55k
=> 1.1(j+k) = 55k
=> j +k = 50k

insufficient.


combining them.
Both equations are identical.
hence no unique solutions.

therefore E

Here is the takeaway from this (from one of Ron/Stuart's comments)

The real "rule" in mathematics is this: If you have n *independent* *linear* equations and n unknowns, you can solve for all n of your unknowns. By "independent", we mean that you can't derive any one equation from the others.
Join the discussion

by 720dreaming » Sun Dec 14, 2008 1:43 am
yup, gotta watch out for those!
Join the discussion

by vishubn » Sun Dec 14, 2008 4:46 am
Damn :) !! laziness ! do cost crazy !!

thanks guys

vishu
KILL !! DIE !! or BEAT my FEAR !!! de@D END!!
Join the discussion