Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Percentage problem

Expert replies
by yvonne0923 » Sat May 07, 2011 12:23 pm
The proportion of minorities among families that own their own home has stayed virtually unchanged over the past 25 years. This can be partially demonstrated by the fact that in 1978, 44.8% of minority working families owned their own home, while in 2003, the home ownership rate of minority working families was 44.6%.

To evaluate the argument above, it would be most useful to compare 1978 and 2003 with regard to which of the following characteristics?

A. The percentage of minority working families who did not own their own home.
B. The number of minority working families who owned homes in 1978 and still owned homes in 2003
C. The percentage of minority working families whose property values increased.
D. The percentage of non-minority working families who owned their own home.
E. The percentage of non-minority working families who live in an apartment.


















_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
I chose the right answer, but I have one more question about an extra choice. What if there's another choice, which gives us the total number of minority and non-minority families in 1978 and the total number of those in 2003, then this can be the right choice as well. Right?


[spoiler]O.A: D[/spoiler]



Thanks.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Arcane66 » Sat May 07, 2011 6:28 pm
Hey, I chose D as well as it was the only one that really stood out. I suppose your hypothetical would be correct, but I don't think the GMAT does this.
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Sun May 08, 2011 9:52 am
yvonne0923 wrote:The proportion of minorities among families that own their own home has stayed virtually unchanged over the past 25 years. This can be partially demonstrated by the fact that in 1978, 44.8% of minority working families owned their own home, while in 2003, the home ownership rate of minority working families was 44.6%.

To evaluate the argument above, it would be most useful to compare 1978 and 2003 with regard to which of the following characteristics?

A. The percentage of minority working families who did not own their own home.
B. The number of minority working families who owned homes in 1978 and still owned homes in 2003
C. The percentage of minority working families whose property values increased.
D. The percentage of non-minority working families who owned their own home.
E. The percentage of non-minority working families who live in an apartment.


















_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
I chose the right answer, but I have one more question about an extra choice. What if there's another choice, which gives us the total number of minority and non-minority families in 1978 and the total number of those in 2003, then this can be the right choice as well. Right?


[spoiler]O.A: D[/spoiler]



Thanks.
where did u et this question
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Join the discussion

by yvonne0923 » Mon May 09, 2011 8:50 am
mundasingh123 wrote:
yvonne0923 wrote:The proportion of minorities among families that own their own home has stayed virtually unchanged over the past 25 years. This can be partially demonstrated by the fact that in 1978, 44.8% of minority working families owned their own home, while in 2003, the home ownership rate of minority working families was 44.6%.

To evaluate the argument above, it would be most useful to compare 1978 and 2003 with regard to which of the following characteristics?

A. The percentage of minority working families who did not own their own home.
B. The number of minority working families who owned homes in 1978 and still owned homes in 2003
C. The percentage of minority working families whose property values increased.
D. The percentage of non-minority working families who owned their own home.
E. The percentage of non-minority working families who live in an apartment.


















_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
I chose the right answer, but I have one more question about an extra choice. What if there's another choice, which gives us the total number of minority and non-minority families in 1978 and the total number of those in 2003, then this can be the right choice as well. Right?


[spoiler]O.A: D[/spoiler]



Thanks.
where did u et this question
Veritas
Join the discussion

by yvonne0923 » Mon May 09, 2011 8:52 am
Arcane66 wrote:Hey, I chose D as well as it was the only one that really stood out. I suppose your hypothetical would be correct, but I don't think the GMAT does this.
Thanks, so when we encounter such problems, we can also treat them as math problems.
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Mon May 09, 2011 9:32 am
yvonne0923 wrote:
Arcane66 wrote:Hey, I chose D as well as it was the only one that really stood out. I suppose your hypothetical would be correct, but I don't think the GMAT does this.
Thanks, so when we encounter such problems, we can also treat them as math problems.
You could solve this problem by Basic common sense . Phew what explanation Veritas give for this . I am skeptical ABOUT any mathematical approach to this CR
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Join the discussion

by shayam » Wed May 11, 2011 5:32 pm
D looks clear among all and I would bet on that.. though ,the percents given in problem refers to minority working group and the Question is on "minority families" and not on minority working families.


For your other part -If total number of minority and non-minority families in 1978 and the total number of those in 2003 is given.....

I think using above stmt,and given facts ,we still land into ambiguities. D option still looks more useful and clear.
Join the discussion

by ankurmit » Wed May 11, 2011 10:53 pm
I could not understand this quistion.Can anyone explain why D is ans.
--------
Ankur mittal
Join the discussion