Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Percentage Problem (Is my method correct?)

Expert replies
by thp510 » Thu Nov 11, 2010 8:14 pm
Company Zula sells only chairs and tables. In 2008, the average price of tables sold by Zula was 10% higher than the average price of chairs. In 2008, Zula also sold 20% fewer tables than chairs. What percent of its revenue in 2008 did company Zula derive from its sales of tables?


How I solved...(?)

1) I used easy numbers. "The avg price of tables sold by Zula was 10% higher than the avg price of chairs". So avg price of tables was $11 and avg price of chairs was $10.

2) "Zula also sold 20% fewer tables than chairs." So, use easy numbers again... Lets say Zula sold 8 tables and 10 chairs.

3) P*Q = revenue
Tables: $11*8=$88
Chairs: $10*10=$100

So answer is, $88/$188 <--($100+$88 = Total Revenue). Is my method correct? Thanks!
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by goyalsau » Thu Nov 11, 2010 8:41 pm
thp510 wrote:Company Zula sells only chairs and tables. In 2008, the average price of tables sold by Zula was 10% higher than the average price of chairs. In 2008, Zula also sold 20% fewer tables than chairs. What percent of its revenue in 2008 did company Zula derive from its sales of tables?


How I solved...(?)

1) I used easy numbers. "The avg price of tables sold by Zula was 10% higher than the avg price of chairs". So avg price of tables was $11 and avg price of chairs was $10.

2) "Zula also sold 20% fewer tables than chairs." So, use easy numbers again... Lets say Zula sold 8 tables and 10 chairs.

3) P*Q = revenue
Tables: $11*8=$88
Chairs: $10*10=$100

So answer is, $88/$188 <--($100+$88 = Total Revenue). Is my method correct? Thanks!
Your approach is absolutely perfect............
Saurabh Goyal
[email protected]
-------------------------


EveryBody Wants to Win But Nobody wants to prepare for Win.
Join the discussion

by thp510 » Fri Nov 12, 2010 1:04 am
goyalsau wrote:
thp510 wrote:Company Zula sells only chairs and tables. In 2008, the average price of tables sold by Zula was 10% higher than the average price of chairs. In 2008, Zula also sold 20% fewer tables than chairs. What percent of its revenue in 2008 did company Zula derive from its sales of tables?


How I solved...(?)

1) I used easy numbers. "The avg price of tables sold by Zula was 10% higher than the avg price of chairs". So avg price of tables was $11 and avg price of chairs was $10.

2) "Zula also sold 20% fewer tables than chairs." So, use easy numbers again... Lets say Zula sold 8 tables and 10 chairs.

3) P*Q = revenue
Tables: $11*8=$88
Chairs: $10*10=$100

So answer is, $88/$188 <--($100+$88 = Total Revenue). Is my method correct? Thanks!
Your approach is absolutely perfect............

Thanks!
Join the discussion