Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Percentage Increase

Expert replies
by [email protected] » Tue Apr 22, 2014 3:41 am
The farmer spent 40% money (i.e. 35 $) on the chicken feed (which he bough at a 20% discount) now if we have to take out the original amount can we do it this way?

40% of 35 dollar is 14 and 120% of 14 is 16.8- Is this the right way to derive the original cost of the chicken feed or im doing some technical mistake here?

Please explain-Thanks
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by GMATGuruNY » Tue Apr 22, 2014 6:24 am
A farmer spent $35 on feed for chickens and goats. He spent 40% money on chicken feed, which he bought at a 20% discount off the full price, and spent the rest on goat feed, which he bought at full price. If the farmer had paid full price for both the chicken feed and the goat feed, what amount would he have spent on the chicken feed and goat feed combined?

A. $37.80
B. $38.50
C. $39.20
D. $39.50
E. $40.60
We need to determine the following ratio:
(full price)/(actual amount spent).

To determine this ratio, plug in an EASY VALUE for the full price of chicken feed.
Since the chicken feed is discounted by 20% -- the equivalent of 1/5 -- let the regular price of chicken feed = $5.

Then:
After the 1/5 discount, the amount spent on chicken feed = 5 - (1/5)*5 = 4.
Since the amount spent on chicken feed represents 40% -- the equivalent of 4/10 -- of the total amount spent, the total amount spent = $10, while the amount spent on goat feed = $6.
Resulting values:
Full price = (regular chicken feed price) + (regular goat feed price) = 5+6 = 11.
Actual amount spent = (regular chicken feed price) + (regular goat feed price) = 4+6 = 10.
Thus:
(full price)/(actual amount spent) = 11/10.

The resulting ratio implies that the full price is equal to 11/10 of the actual amount spent ($35):
(11/10) * 35 = (11/2) * 7 = 77/2 = 38.5.

The correct answer is B.
Last edited by GMATGuruNY on Tue Apr 22, 2014 7:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Tue Apr 22, 2014 6:24 am
A farmer spent $35 on feed for chickens and goats. He spent 40% of the money on chicken feed, which he bought at a 20% discount off the full price, and spent the rest on goat feed, which he bought at full price. If the farmer had paid full price for both the chicken feed and the goat feed, what amount would he have spent on the chicken feed and goat feed combined?

A. $37.80
B. $38.50
C. $39.20
D. $39.50
E. $40.60
He spent 40% (of the $35) on chicken feed.
40% of $35 = $14. So, he spent $14 on chicken feed.

He got a 20% discount on the chicken feed.
In other words, he paid 80% of the original price.
So, let C = original price of chicken feed.
We can write 80% of C = $14
Or we can write 0.8C = $14
Or, even better, (4/5)C = $14

To solve for C, we'll multiply both sides by 5/4 to get: C = (14)(5/4) = 17 1/2
So, the original price of the chicken feed = $17.5

Finally, if the farmer spent $14 (of the original $35) on chicken feed, then he spent the remaining $21 on goat feed (at no discount).

So, without the discount, the farmer would have paid $17.5 + $21 =[spoiler] $38.50 = B[/spoiler]

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Tue Apr 22, 2014 6:30 am
[email protected] wrote:
40% of 35 dollar is 14 and 120% of 14 is 16.8- Is this the right way to derive the original cost of the chicken feed or im doing some technical mistake here?
This is a common error.
If the sale price is 20% less than the original price, we CANNOT conclude that the original price is 20% greater than the sale price.

Consider this example: If the original price is $5 and the sale price is $4, then the sale price is 20% less than the original price. HOWEVER, the original price ($5) is NOT 20% more than the sale price ($4). The original price is 25% more than the sale price .

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion