Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

percentage increase question

Expert replies
by redman » Mon Sep 29, 2008 5:31 am
this is a basic question that i'm trying to figure out.. its on a Kaplan guide book..

Jane makes toy bears. When she works with an assistant, she makes 80 percent more bears per week, and works 10 percent fewer hours each week. Having an assistant increases Jane's output of toy bears per hour by what percent?

I answered 100 %, but the correct answer is 200%. Is this a trick question? What should I look out for in future questions to avoid this pitfall?

Any help is much appreciated.
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by GG04 » Mon Sep 29, 2008 5:49 am
I do not understand how to get 200% either. But this is my explanation for doing this.
Lets assume she makes 100 bears per week and works 10 hours.
So number of bears she makes in an hour = 100/10 = 10 bears/hour

With assistant, she makes 80% more = 180 bears per week and works 10% less = 9 hours per week.
So number of bears she makes with assistant in an hour = 180/9 =
20 bears/hour

Percent inc = inc/original * 100 = (20-10)/10 * 100 = 100%.
How do u get 200%?
Join the discussion

by hislander819 » Mon Sep 29, 2008 9:32 am
I am generally much stronger in Verbal, so whenever possible I will try to plug in values to arrive at my answer. Thus, see below:

Assume Jane works 40 hours per week, and has a weekly output of 120 bears.

Now, we need to calculate her weekly output with an assistant:

120 x .8 = 96 (then add it to 120 to get 80% more)
120 + 96 = 216

So, with an assistant she makes 216 bears per week. As for her hours, she works 10% less with an assistant. So:

40 x .10 = 4
40 - 4 = 36

Therefore, her output of toy bears went from 120/40 = 3/week to 216/36 = 6/week.

Then, its simply 6/3 = 2, or 200%
Join the discussion

percentage increase question

by raijonney » Mon Sep 29, 2008 10:29 pm
Lets say:

Jane makes x bears per week
and Jane works for y hours per week

therefore, she makes x bears in y hours (per week)
which implies she makes x/y bears per hour (per week)

Now with help of an assistant:

Jane makes 80% more bears are made i.e. x + 0.8x = 1.8x bears per week, and
works 10% less i.e. y - .1y = 0.9y hours per week

therefore, now together they make 1.8x/0.9y bears per hour (per week)

Hence % increase in output PER HOUR is :

((1.8x/0.9y) / (x/y) ) * 100 = 200 %
Join the discussion

by GG04 » Tue Sep 30, 2008 6:56 am
Raionney and hislander,

the problem with ur computation is that u have not considered the % increase which is (Increased value - original value)/original value
Join the discussion

by varun nagpal » Tue Sep 30, 2008 11:03 am
200% of 3 weeks is 9 weeks not 6 weeks (common sense)


Even I get 100% the question is worng or the answer given in Kapalan is worng
Join the discussion

by varun nagpal » Tue Sep 30, 2008 11:04 am
200% of 3 weeks is 9 weeks not 6 weeks (common sense)


Even I get 100% the question is worng or the answer given in Kapalan is worng
Join the discussion

by exeter » Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:44 pm
GG04 wrote:I do not understand how to get 200% either. But this is my explanation for doing this.
Lets assume she makes 100 bears per week and works 10 hours.
So number of bears she makes in an hour = 100/10 = 10 bears/hour

With assistant, she makes 80% more = 180 bears per week and works 10% less = 9 hours per week.
So number of bears she makes with assistant in an hour = 180/9 =
20 bears/hour

Percent inc = inc/original * 100 = (20-10)/10 * 100 = 100%.
How do u get 200%?
GG04 - your reasoning is perfect until the last sentence.
% increase = 100 * [ new rate ] / [old rate]
There is NO subtraction.

[new rate] = 20 bears / hour
[old rate] = 10 bears / hour

Therefore the % increase = 100* [ 20 bears / hour ] / [10 bears / hour] = 100 * [20 / 10] = 200%
Join the discussion

by GG04 » Tue Sep 30, 2008 5:48 pm
i am not sure if i am missing something here, but why wud u just multiply it by the new rate? is'nt that conceptually wrong?
increase in value of anything has to be the difference in new value and old value..
Join the discussion

by exeter » Tue Sep 30, 2008 6:34 pm
Ahh ok sorry. I interpreted the question to mean something else. I agree with you.

Question: “Having an assistant increases Jane's output of toy bears per hour by what percent?”

I interpreted the question as how fast Jane + assistant is working, compared with Jane alone. This is 200% as Jane + assistant is twice as fast as Jane solo (the multiplication of 100 was just to get it into % form, I am dividing the new rate by the old rate).

However looking at the question again, I realise it says by what % has Jane’s output increased. Which is what you did.

Based on the wording of the question, I think 100% is the right answer and Kaplan’s answer is wrong (or they worded the question wrongly).
Join the discussion