BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Percent of percent DS

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Anurag@Gurome » Mon Dec 26, 2011 3:40 am
karthikpandian19 wrote:Is X percent of Y more than Z percent of W?

(1) X percent of Z is one half of Y percent of W.

(2) X=Y and 2·Z=W
Is X% of Y > Z% of W? or is XY > ZW?

(1) X% of Z = (1/2)Y% of W
XZ/100 = YW/200
2XZ = YW; NOT sufficient.

(2) X = Y and 2Z = W
X² > 2Z²; NOT sufficient.

Combining (1) and (2), 2XZ = YW or X = Y and W = 2X does not imply anything new; NOT sufficient.

The correct answer is E.
Last edited by Anurag@Gurome on Tue Dec 27, 2011 1:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
Join the discussion

by karthikpandian19 » Mon Dec 26, 2011 5:18 am
@Anurag...

I found this from Master GMAT preparation question and it states the answer as E

Explanation:

"MASTER GMAT:
Correct.Solving this question by any method other than Plugging In would be suicidal.Plug in for statement (1) x=10, z=50, y=10, w=100 to get a "No" answer. Ask yourself if it is always "No". Try different numbers. For instance, x=30, z=20, y=30, w=40. The answer is now "Yes". Therefore, (1) Maybe->Insufficient->BCE.Plug in for statement (2). Try to use the same numbers if you can, to save time and careless errors. There is no definite answer, therefore (2) Maybe->Insufficient->CE.Combining the statements does not make any difference, as the numbers prove. Therefore, (1)+(2) Maybe-> Insufficient->E."
Anurag@Gurome wrote:
karthikpandian19 wrote:Is X percent of Y more than Z percent of W?

(1) X percent of Z is one half of Y percent of W.

(2) X=Y and 2·Z=W
Is X% of Y > Z% of W? or is XY > ZW?

(1) X% of Z = (1/2)Y% of W
XZ/100 = YW/200
2XZ = YW; NOT sufficient.

(2) X = Y and 2Z = W
X² > 2Z²; NOT sufficient.

Combining (1) and (2), 2X² = 2XZ or X = Z = Y and W = 2X implies X² > 2X², which is not true. So, the answer to the main question is "No"; SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is C.
Join the discussion

by karthikpandian19 » Mon Dec 26, 2011 11:43 pm
Can anyone explain which the explanations above is correct???
Join the discussion

by rijul007 » Mon Dec 26, 2011 11:58 pm
karthikpandian19 wrote:Is X percent of Y more than Z percent of W?

(1) X percent of Z is one half of Y percent of W.

(2) X=Y and 2·Z=W
Rephrase the ques as
Is XY/100 > WZ/100?
or

Is XY > WZ?


(1) X percent of Z is one half of Y percent of W.

XZ/100 = YW/200
XZ = YW/2

Lets check by plugging numbers
case 1:
X = 2
Y = 1
Z = 50
W = 100

case 2:
X = 50
Y = 100
W = 1
Z = 2



Not sufficient


(2) X=Y and 2·Z=W

XY = Y^2 = X^2
WZ = 4Z^2 = W^2 / 4

Not sufficient

Combining (1) and (2)
Substitute X=Y and 2.Z = W in XZ = YW/2

1/2 = 1/2

Not sufficient


Option E
Join the discussion

by rijul007 » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:05 am
Anurag@Gurome wrote:
karthikpandian19 wrote:Is X percent of Y more than Z percent of W?

(1) X percent of Z is one half of Y percent of W.

(2) X=Y and 2·Z=W
Is X% of Y > Z% of W? or is XY > ZW?

(1) X% of Z = (1/2)Y% of W
XZ/100 = YW/200
2XZ = YW; NOT sufficient.

(2) X = Y and 2Z = W
X² > 2Z²; NOT sufficient.

Combining (1) and (2), 2X² = 2XZ or X = Z = Y and W = 2X implies X² > 2X², which is not true. So, the answer to the main question is "No"; SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is C.
2XZ = YW
=> 2XZ = 2XZ

Z is not equal to X
So the conversion 2XZ to 2X² would be wrong.
Join the discussion

by Anurag@Gurome » Tue Dec 27, 2011 1:53 am
rijul007 wrote:
2XZ = YW
=> 2XZ = 2XZ

Z is not equal to X
So the conversion 2XZ to 2X² would be wrong.
That's right, i have edited the previous post. Thanks for pointing the same!
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
Join the discussion

by ArunangsuSahu » Tue Jan 03, 2012 10:08 pm
Question: XY >ZW?

Statement 1:

2XZ = YW

No Conclusion....INSUFFICIENT

Statement 2:

X=Y, 2Z =W.

No Correlation...INSUFFICIENT

Combining (1) and (2) Y^2 > 2Z^2...NO CONCLUSION

So (E) is the answer
Join the discussion