BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Per a recent survey carried out in Rambo City,

Expert replies
by aditya8062 » Sun Feb 24, 2013 7:57 pm
Per a recent survey carried out in Rambo City, capital of Papula country, an average middle-aged person drives his or her car for two thousand miles in a year and 99% of these people own a gasoline-run car. In addition, the survey suggested that if offered an economical option to switch to electric cars, most of these people would change their gasoline-run cars. The government of Papula is impressed with the environmental considerations shown by the citizens of Papula and is planning to implement a plan that would allow all the current owners of gasoline-run cars to switch to electric cars at a minimal cost.

Which of the following statements casts the most doubt on the ability of the plan to meet its required objective of significantly reducing air pollution in Papula in the next 5 years?

A. Though some of the citizens are concerned about the negative environmental impact of air pollution, they will not spend any extra money to protect the environment.
B. The budget deficit of the government of Papula is already at alarming levels, and any further increase in the deficit could lead to the bankruptcy of the country.
C. Since Papula is an aging country, with more than half its population near retirement age, the chief consideration for a large number of its citizens is the convenience to drive rather than the costs to do so.
D. In the last two decades, Papula has emerged as a major economic hub, leading to an increase in the living standard of its citizens and in the number of cars in the region.
E. Since people who don't own gasoline cars would not be benefitted from the proposed plan, they may strongly oppose the use of taxpayer money on such a plan.

the OA stated is C
but i somehow find hard to digest it as answer
isn't C making assumption that electric cars are more convenient than gasoline cars ? moreover we cant be sure as in what is convenient for older people .they might like less noise in their automobile and electric cars definitely make less noise than gasoline cars so who knows they might just like electric cars !!!

also the question stem never say that the plan if implemented, that means that we can very well doubt on the fact whether plan can be implemented or not in the first place .thinking this i picked B
thanks and regards
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by David@VeritasPrep » Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:11 pm
This one appears to have recently been discussed at this link https://gmatclub.com/forum/gasoline-cars ... 47427.html

The official answer given is C but Ron Awad - Veritas Instructor Extraordinaire from Montreal (that I have had the pleasure of meeting since I live only 90 minutes from Montreal) has given us a convincing case for choice A as the best answer.

Ron convincingly argues that the best way to short circuit this plan is to prevent it from even getting started - which is what you are saying aditya, but he concludes that choice A does the best job of stopping the plan since choice A says unequivocally that the "some" citizens who are concerned about the environment "will NOT spend ANY extra money" so even if there is "minimal cost" that will not matter since the people will spend nothing at all. This is much better than choice C which requires that we decide - as you mentioned aditya - that gasoline cars are some how more convenient.

Choice B also requires the assumption that the plan will cost lots of money for Papula - or that giong bankrupt is something that Papula is not willing to do. Perhaps the plan will not cost the government anything to implement or they are willing to do what it takes to save the environment, even go bankrupt.
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Join the discussion

by aditya8062 » Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:24 pm
to David@VeritasPrep
good day sir
the reason i rejected A is because it uses "some" .now "some" is very vague .i mean who knows "some" can mean 3 people or 4 people for that matter .and hence i think it wont affect my plan .but yes had A talked of majority then it cud have been a good choice !
thanks and regards
Join the discussion

by Tommy Wallach » Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:49 pm
Hey Aditya,

Looks like your question got answered. I would argue this isn't a very well-written question, as neither of those answer choices do enough. You're right that the "some" in answer choice (A) is problematic, and (C) is bad for the reasons you/David cite. Definitely a weird one!

-t
Tommy Wallach, Company Expert
ManhattanGMAT

If you found this posting mega-helpful, feel free to thank and/or follow me!
Join the discussion

by aditya8062 » Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:55 pm
To
Tommy Wallach

good day sir
if A and C are out and if B can be thought as what i thought initially ,doesn't that make B better in all worst choice .atleast B is giving us that "window" or "opening" to make us realize that achieving the plan is itself difficult . i agree that had the question stem said :the plan if implemented ....blah blah ..then i wud have cancelled even B
thanks and regards
Join the discussion

by Tommy Wallach » Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:58 pm
Nah, B's no good either. I mean, what are the ramifications of bankruptcy, really? The conclusion doesn't argue that it's a financially responsible thing to do, only that most people would do it if offered it.

Weird one. I say again.

-t
Tommy Wallach, Company Expert
ManhattanGMAT

If you found this posting mega-helpful, feel free to thank and/or follow me!
Join the discussion

by aditya8062 » Sun Feb 24, 2013 9:35 pm
To Tommy Wallach
firstly thanks for guiding me through all this
as for ramifications of bankruptcy. i believe that objections to arguments do act as weakeners and underminers of objections to argument act as strengthener. so all i thought that may be this bankruptcy is giving govt a red flag and they may think that financially this plan might cost more than it may do good
but ,as directed by u ,i will put this question to rest
thanks again for being so patient with my arguments
regards
Join the discussion

by David@VeritasPrep » Mon Feb 25, 2013 4:39 am
"Some" is normally pretty weak word to have on strengthen or weaken questions, however, I think that the reason Ron went with answer choice A - (I was going to say that none of them seem correct) - is that A does say "some", but it says "Though some of the citizens are concerned about the negative environmental impact of air pollution, they will not spend any extra money to protect the environment."

So in other words, ALL of those people who would be inclined to protect the environment will not spend any extra money. It is a bit like saying "Some people have been president of the United States and they have all been men. Even though there is a "some" term it leads to saying that "All U.S. Presidents have been men."

If this answer said "Some people drive gasoline powered cars and they are not interested in switching to electric cars at even a minimal cost" that would be a correct answer even with the word "some". Now with this choice A that we have, perhaps the "some" people who care about the environment are not the ones who would switch to electric cars - so that might be a weakness with choice A. For example, maybe some people think electric would be cheaper or as you said quieter and even with choice A those people who do not care about the environment might still switch - since they are not included in the "some".

Let me add my voice to Tommy's and say it is a strange one. I agree that we can put it too rest!
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Join the discussion