BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

people who exceed the speed limit

Expert replies
by gmatnmein2010 » Sat Feb 20, 2010 3:11 am
On average, the number of speeding tickets issued in County X every year is three times greater than the number of speeding tickets issued in County Y during the same period. Therefore, the number of people who exceed the speed limit must be higher in County X than in County Y.
Which of the following describes a flaw in the reasoning above?


The argument fails to take into account that the speed limit may be different in the two counties.


The argument fails to take into account that the number of tickets issued in County X may reflect a lower proportion of drivers overall in that county.


The argument fails to take into account that a single driver can receive more than one ticket in a given year.


The argument fails to take into account that residents of County Y may be more law-abiding overall.


The argument fails to take into account that residents of County X may not be aware of the speed limit in that county.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by fibbonnaci » Sat Feb 20, 2010 4:54 am
where is the 5th option??
Join the discussion

by thephoenix » Sat Feb 20, 2010 5:31 am
fibbonnaci wrote:where is the 5th option??
hey fibb there are 5 choices luks like gmatnmein2010 is in hurry he is not underlining in s/c and now he is not putting a , b , c in front of option......luks like he his running in a race while posting in forum
IMO C for this

conclusion: the number of people who exceed the speed limit in County X must be higher than the number who exceed the speed limit in County Y on the grounds that the number of tickets issued in County X is higher

flaw is the author wrngly assumes that every ticket corresponds to a different individual

only C brings this flaw in light
Join the discussion

by rohan_vus » Sat Feb 20, 2010 6:18 am
thephoenix wrote:
fibbonnaci wrote:where is the 5th option??
hey fibb there are 5 choices luks like gmatnmein2010 is in hurry he is not underlining in s/c and now he is not putting a , b , c in front of option......luks like he his running in a race while posting in forum
Lolz.. :mrgreen: .. i second thephoenix...I am not that regular but still weekly i check out on this forum. Of late i have been seeing huge surge in questions being posted , where many have already been discussed .Some repeat posts are back to back..clearly shows the motives of the posters as being out of sheer contest interest ..

I can certainly feel a big difference over last couple of weeks .

I am not sure , but i wish this whatever race/contest is going on ends sooner than later . Atleast then we can have serious questions and discussions happening . In this mad race ,now you have many Gmat Destroyers getting created within a week :shock:
Join the discussion

by firdaus117 » Sat Feb 20, 2010 6:24 am
IMO Option 3.
Join the discussion

by komal » Sat Feb 20, 2010 9:27 am
gmatnmein2010 wrote:On average, the number of speeding tickets issued in County X every year is three times greater than the number of speeding tickets issued in County Y during the same period. Therefore, the number of people who exceed the speed limit must be higher in County X than in County Y.
Which of the following describes a flaw in the reasoning above?


The argument fails to take into account that the speed limit may be different in the two counties.
Incorrect : Speed limit comparison between two countries is irrelevant.

The argument fails to take into account that the number of tickets issued in County X may reflect a lower proportion of drivers overall in that county.
Incorrect : Proportion of drivers in county X is not an issue here.

The argument fails to take into account that a single driver can receive more than one ticket in a given year.
Correct : Just because 'speeding tickets issued is more' in county X does not mean 'speeding tickets is issued to more people'. This answer choice correctly points out this flaw in the argument.

The argument fails to take into account that residents of County Y may be more law-abiding overall.
Incorrect : Will the issue of law abiding citizen in county Y bring out the flaw in the above passage? No!!! ... Eliminated.

The argument fails to take into account that residents of County X may not be aware of the speed limit in that county.
Incorrect : Speed limit is not the issue here.
Join the discussion