BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

people who exceed the speed limit

Expert replies
by gmatnmein2010 » Sat Feb 20, 2010 3:11 am
On average, the number of speeding tickets issued in County X every year is three times greater than the number of speeding tickets issued in County Y during the same period. Therefore, the number of people who exceed the speed limit must be higher in County X than in County Y.
Which of the following describes a flaw in the reasoning above?


The argument fails to take into account that the speed limit may be different in the two counties.


The argument fails to take into account that the number of tickets issued in County X may reflect a lower proportion of drivers overall in that county.


The argument fails to take into account that a single driver can receive more than one ticket in a given year.


The argument fails to take into account that residents of County Y may be more law-abiding overall.


The argument fails to take into account that residents of County X may not be aware of the speed limit in that county.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by fibbonnaci » Sat Feb 20, 2010 4:54 am
where is the 5th option??
Join the discussion

by thephoenix » Sat Feb 20, 2010 5:31 am
fibbonnaci wrote:where is the 5th option??
hey fibb there are 5 choices luks like gmatnmein2010 is in hurry he is not underlining in s/c and now he is not putting a , b , c in front of option......luks like he his running in a race while posting in forum
IMO C for this

conclusion: the number of people who exceed the speed limit in County X must be higher than the number who exceed the speed limit in County Y on the grounds that the number of tickets issued in County X is higher

flaw is the author wrngly assumes that every ticket corresponds to a different individual

only C brings this flaw in light
Join the discussion

by rohan_vus » Sat Feb 20, 2010 6:18 am
thephoenix wrote:
fibbonnaci wrote:where is the 5th option??
hey fibb there are 5 choices luks like gmatnmein2010 is in hurry he is not underlining in s/c and now he is not putting a , b , c in front of option......luks like he his running in a race while posting in forum
Lolz.. :mrgreen: .. i second thephoenix...I am not that regular but still weekly i check out on this forum. Of late i have been seeing huge surge in questions being posted , where many have already been discussed .Some repeat posts are back to back..clearly shows the motives of the posters as being out of sheer contest interest ..

I can certainly feel a big difference over last couple of weeks .

I am not sure , but i wish this whatever race/contest is going on ends sooner than later . Atleast then we can have serious questions and discussions happening . In this mad race ,now you have many Gmat Destroyers getting created within a week :shock:
Join the discussion

by firdaus117 » Sat Feb 20, 2010 6:24 am
IMO Option 3.
Join the discussion

by komal » Sat Feb 20, 2010 9:27 am
gmatnmein2010 wrote:On average, the number of speeding tickets issued in County X every year is three times greater than the number of speeding tickets issued in County Y during the same period. Therefore, the number of people who exceed the speed limit must be higher in County X than in County Y.
Which of the following describes a flaw in the reasoning above?


The argument fails to take into account that the speed limit may be different in the two counties.
Incorrect : Speed limit comparison between two countries is irrelevant.

The argument fails to take into account that the number of tickets issued in County X may reflect a lower proportion of drivers overall in that county.
Incorrect : Proportion of drivers in county X is not an issue here.

The argument fails to take into account that a single driver can receive more than one ticket in a given year.
Correct : Just because 'speeding tickets issued is more' in county X does not mean 'speeding tickets is issued to more people'. This answer choice correctly points out this flaw in the argument.

The argument fails to take into account that residents of County Y may be more law-abiding overall.
Incorrect : Will the issue of law abiding citizen in county Y bring out the flaw in the above passage? No!!! ... Eliminated.

The argument fails to take into account that residents of County X may not be aware of the speed limit in that county.
Incorrect : Speed limit is not the issue here.
Join the discussion