BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

peculiar columnar

Expert replies
by akhpad » Tue May 25, 2010 2:34 am
Source: Kaplan Verbal Workbook

The cause of the peculiar columnar growth pattern displayed by junipers growing near burning underground veins of lignite coal has never been convincingly explained. Until recently, the accepted theory posited that the abundance of carbon monoxide in the local atmosphere caused the columnar growth. However, a new theory holds that the cause is the persistent heat present near these underground fires which, while not intense enough to inflame the trees, can nonetheless change their normal growth pattern.

The existence of which of the following would provide the strongest support for the new theory?

A. A columnar juniper growing in an atmosphere of intense heat and an absence of carbon monoxide.
B. A normal juniper growing in an atmosphere of intense heat and an absence of carbon monoxide.
C. A columnar juniper growing in an atmosphere of normal heat and a high concentration of carbon monoxide.
D. A normal juniper growing in an atmosphere of intense heat and a high concentration of carbon monoxide.
E. A columnar juniper growing in an atmosphere of intense heat and a high concentration of carbon monoxide.

OA: A

Please explain
Last edited by akhpad on Tue May 25, 2010 3:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by paes » Tue May 25, 2010 2:39 am
IMO A
Join the discussion

by liferocks » Tue May 25, 2010 2:44 am
I will go with B

Here the argument is columnar growth pattern displayed by junipers is result of persistent heat not of the abundance of carbon monoxide in the local atmosphere.

If ' A normal juniper growing in an atmosphere of intense heat and an absence of carbon monoxide. ' shows similar columnar growth pattern this theory will be proved.Hence option B.
"If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there."
Lewis Carroll
Join the discussion

by akhpad » Tue May 25, 2010 3:40 am
paes wrote:IMO A
Such comment is not helpful.
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Tue May 25, 2010 3:45 am
akhp77 wrote:
paes wrote:IMO A
Such comment is not helpful.
accepted theory says X caused Y. New theory says Z caused Y. How can we strengthen the stance of New theory??

St A brings in the fact that Y will happen in a environment even though X is not present & only Z is present.

X: Carbon Monoxide
Y: Columnar growth in Junipers
Z: Heat liberated by lignite coal

prasad bhai, i think that :"normal Juniper" is just a red herring/ distractor. U can disgard those words that comes out of scope !!

Plz reconnect my reasoning with CR bible 5 ways of strengthening. It will make sense!!
Join the discussion

by akhpad » Tue May 25, 2010 4:18 am
gmatmachoman wrote: accepted theory says X caused Y. New theory says Z caused Y. How can we strengthen the stance of New theory??

St A brings in the fact that Y will happen in a environment even though X is not present & only Z is present.

X: Carbon Monoxide
Y: Columnar growth in Junipers
Z: Heat liberated by lignite coal

prasad bhai, i think that :"normal Juniper" is just a red herring/ distractor. U can disgard those words that comes out of scope !!

Plz reconnect my reasoning with CR bible 5 ways of strengthening. It will make sense!!
Y will happen in a environment even though X is not present & only Z is present. => This is strengthening the new theory and weakening the old theory.

I believe that this is ok.

I was having difficulty to understand stimulus.

Thanks
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Tue May 25, 2010 4:32 am
akhp77 wrote:
gmatmachoman wrote: accepted theory says X caused Y. New theory says Z caused Y. How can we strengthen the stance of New theory??

St A brings in the fact that Y will happen in a environment even though X is not present & only Z is present.

X: Carbon Monoxide
Y: Columnar growth in Junipers
Z: Heat liberated by lignite coal

prasad bhai, i think that :"normal Juniper" is just a red herring/ distractor. U can disgard those words that comes out of scope !!

Plz reconnect my reasoning with CR bible 5 ways of strengthening. It will make sense!!
Y will happen in a environment even though X is not present & only Z is present. => This is strengthening the new theory and weakening the old theory.

I believe that this is ok.

I was having difficulty to understand stimulus.

Thanks
wow wow!! Thanked by Pheonix bhai & LR is something rewarding..hmm that makes sense!! but the worst part is i will be missing the grockit prize today becox of not knowing the timings!!

Thanks guys!
Join the discussion

by paes » Tue May 25, 2010 8:50 pm
akhp77 wrote:
paes wrote:IMO A
Such comment is not helpful.
agreed, I will take care.
Actually, that time OA was not there, So I was not willing to explain a doubtful answer.
The other point, it was looking straight forward to me.
Join the discussion