BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Pear Trees

Expert replies
by kaulnikhil » Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:15 am
The local agricultural official gave the fruit growers
of the District 10 Farmers' Cooperative a new
pesticide that they applied for a period of three.years
in their pear orchards in place of the pesticide they
had formerly applied' During those three years, the
Proportion of pears lost to insects was significantly
iess-than it had been during the previous three-year
period. On the basis of these results, the official
concluded that the new pesticide was more effective
than the old pesticide, at least in the short term, in
limiting the loss of certain fruit to insects'
The official's conclusion is most strongly supported
if which one of the following groups of trees did not
show a reduction in losses of fruit to insects?
(A) peach trees grown in the district that were
treated with the new pesticide instead of the
old Pesticide
(B) peach trees grown in the district that were
treated with the new pesticide in addition to
the old Pesticide
(C) Pear trees grown in the district those were
treated with the old pesticide instead of the
new pesticide
(D) pear trees grown in a neighboring district that
were treated with neither the old nor the new
pesticide
(E) pear trees grown in the district that
-were
treated with the new pesticide instead of
the old Pesticide
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Testluv » Fri Dec 18, 2009 12:20 pm
First of all, the scope of the argument is pear trees and not peach trees, so we can eliminate choices A and B immediately (ie, without having to read them). We are looking to bolster the argument that it was the new pesticide that was the cause of the trees being less vulnerable to insect damage. The stem is specific here: we need to figure out how to strengthen the argument by thinking about a group of trees that are still vulnerable to insect damage. Well, if we want to strengthen the idea that the new pesticides are the thing making pear trees less vulnerable to insect damage, then a choice that shows that without the pesticides the trees are still vulnerable to insects would do the trick--that's choice C.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion