BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

Pat mark and kate charged a total of 162 hours

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 31
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 10:55 amFollowed by: 1 member
by HeyArnold » Sat Oct 22, 2011 12:34 pm
Pat, Kate and Mark charged a total of 162 hours to a certain project. If Pat charged twice as much to the project as Kate and 1/3 as much time as Mark, how many more hours did Mark charge to the project than Kate?
A. 18
B. 36
C. 72
D. 90
E. 108





I understand that you can use a single variable here, but I chose to set Pat as the variable (since the question phrases everyone in relation to pat)

So I said:

Pat = X
Kate = 1/2 X
Mark = 3X

4.5X = 162... clearly this didn't work out, why doesn't this work? As opposed to saying:

Kate = X
Pat = 2X
Mark = 6X

9X = 162 gives the correct answer!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Problem Solving |
User avatar
Community Manager
Posts: 1060
Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 6:46 amFollowed by: 52 members
Location: Utrecht, The Netherlands
Thanked: 318 times

by neelgandham » Sat Oct 22, 2011 12:47 pm
HeyArnold wrote:Pat, Kate and Mark charged a total of 162 hours to a certain project. If Pat charged twice as much to the project as Kate and 1/3 as much time as Mark, how many more hours did Mark charge to the project than Kate?
A. 18
B. 36
C. 72
D. 90
E. 108

I understand that you can use a single variable here, but I chose to set Pat as the variable (since the question phrases everyone in relation to pat)

So I said:

Pat = X
Kate = 1/2 X
Mark = 3X

4.5X = 162... clearly this didn't work out, why doesn't this work?
It works, it is just that you stopped it there
4.5X = 162
=> 9X = 324
=> X = 36

So Mark charged 3X = 3*36 = 108
and Kate charged 0.5X = 18
So, Answer = 3x-0.5x = 90


As opposed to saying:

Kate = X
Pat = 2X
Mark = 6X

9X = 162 gives the correct answer!
=> X = 18
=> Mark = 6X = 6*18 = 108
=> Kate = X = 18
So answer = 6X-X = 90

Please find the answer in Bold ! Let me know if you still need help in understanding ?
Anil Gandham
Welcome to BEATtheGMAT | Photography | Getting Started | BTG Community rules | MBA Watch
Check out GMAT Prep Now's online course at https://www.gmatprepnow.com/
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pmFollowed by: 1906 members
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Sun Oct 23, 2011 3:45 am
HeyArnold wrote:Pat, Kate and Mark charged a total of 162 hours to a certain project. If Pat charged twice as much to the project as Kate and 1/3 as much time as Mark, how many more hours did Mark charge to the project than Kate?
A. 18
B. 36
C. 72
D. 90
E. 108





I understand that you can use a single variable here, but I chose to set Pat as the variable (since the question phrases everyone in relation to pat)

So I said:

Pat = X
Kate = 1/2 X
Mark = 3X

4.5X = 162... clearly this didn't work out, why doesn't this work?
The approach above is fine.
x = 162/4.5 = 36.
Mark = 3x = 3*36 = 108.
Kate = (1/2)x = (1/2)*36 = 18.
Mark-Kate = 108-18 = 90.

I would plug in values.

Let Mark = 6.
Pat = (1/3)*6 = 2.
Since Pat charges twice Kate, Kate = 1.
Thus, Mark : Pat : Kate = 6:2:1.

Since 6+2+1 = 9, and 162/9 = 18, all of the values in the ratio must be multiplied by 18:
Mark : Pat : Kate = 18*(6:2:1) = 108:36:18.

Mark-Kate = 108-18 = 90.

The correct answer is D.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1