BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Past tense vs Past perfect

Expert replies
by gmatjeet » Mon Jun 27, 2011 10:47 am
His studies of ice-polished rocks in his Alpine homeland, far outside the range of present-day glaciers, led Louis Agassiz in 1837 to propose the concept of an age in which great ice sheets had existed in what are now temperate areas

(A) in which great ice sheets had existed in what are now temperate areas
(B) in which great ice sheets existed in what are now temperate areas
(C) when great ice sheets existed where there were areas now temperate
(D) when great ice sheets had existed in current temperate areas
(E) when great ice sheets existed in areas now that are temperate

OA : B

I have understood all parts of the question. There is only one doubt which i have with the explanation.

OG says the verb form should be SIMPLE PAST "EXISTED" rather than PAST PERFECT "HAD EXISTED". I am unable to understand this.

"led" Louis Agassiz - past tense
concept of an age in which great ice sheets "had existed" - past perfect

As per me the above correctly shows chronological sequence of events.

Can some expert please explain?
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by aspirant2011 » Mon Jun 27, 2011 11:38 am
I feel simple past tense is preferable to past perfect and moreover I feel though not sure that option A changes the intended meaning of the sentence by introducing had existed
Join the discussion

by sameerballani » Mon Jun 27, 2011 7:46 pm
gmatjeet wrote:His studies of ice-polished rocks in his Alpine homeland, far outside the range of present-day glaciers, led Louis Agassiz in 1837 to propose the concept of an age in which great ice sheets had existed in what are now temperate areas

(A) in which great ice sheets had existed in what are now temperate areas
(B) in which great ice sheets existed in what are now temperate areas
(C) when great ice sheets existed where there were areas now temperate
(D) when great ice sheets had existed in current temperate areas
(E) when great ice sheets existed in areas now that are temperate

OA : B

I have understood all parts of the question. There is only one doubt which i have with the explanation.

OG says the verb form should be SIMPLE PAST "EXISTED" rather than PAST PERFECT "HAD EXISTED". I am unable to understand this.

"led" Louis Agassiz - past tense
concept of an age in which great ice sheets "had existed" - past perfect

As per me the above correctly shows chronological sequence of events.

Can some expert please explain?


It should be be simple past reason being- led x to propose Y (Y is a general statement and simple past would be preferred)
we need to understand that tense should be same as for AGE IN WHICH, so if we use past perfect. ice sheets go earlier than this age.
I hope i make some sense
Thanks
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1