BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Past Perfect Verb form

Expert replies
by neer.king » Mon Jul 23, 2012 12:05 am
Unfortunately for the commuters who lost their lives when the bridge collapsed, the engineer was not
honest
at the preliminary public safety commission hearing, when he was questioned about the structure's weight-bearing abilities.
â—� was not honest
â—� was not
â—� was honest
â—� had not been honest
â—� had not been being honest

shouldn't past form be used in this sentence ?
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by Kasia@EconomistGMAT » Mon Jul 23, 2012 12:28 am
The bridge collapsed later, the preliminary hearing took place earlier. Therefore, the correct answer should be D. However, there is a mistake in the non-underlined part "he WAS questioned." The questioning is simultaneous with the engineer's dishonesty and this part of the sentence should say " he HAD BEEN questioned."
Kasia
Senior Instructor
Master GMAT - the #1 rated GMAT course

"¢ If you found my post helpful, please click the "thank" button and/or follow me.

"¢ Take a 7 day free trial and find out why Economist GMAT is the highest rated GMAT course - https://gmat.economist.com/

"¢ Read GMAT Economist reviews - https://reviews.beatthegmat.com/economis ... mat-course
Join the discussion

by CSASHISHPANDAY » Mon Jul 23, 2012 12:45 am
Hi,
I think While asking "shouldn't past form be used in this sentence" you simply want to know whether simple past can be used here or not?

To choose between Past vs Past perfect ask question to yourself:
whether event occurred in past?
whether it is connected with later event?

If answer is yes then use past perfect.

Now come to your question:

"he was not honest" before he was questioned i.e. accident occurred due to the engineer's earlier dishonesty. (He did something in the past that occurred before something else in the past, thus past perfect should be used.)
No doubt answer is D

It would be better if sentence be "although it would be even better if sentence was "when he had been questioned"
Join the discussion

by neer.king » Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:05 am
ohkk thnx guys.. i didn't get the context in the first go. Got it now.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1