BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

past&future

Expert replies
by gmatmachoman » Thu Aug 20, 2009 8:53 am
In the past, teachers, bank tellers, and secretaries were predominantly men; these
occupations slipped in pay and status when women largely occupied them. Therefore, if
women become the majority in currently male-dominated professions like accounting,
law, and medicine, the income and prestige of these professions will also drop.

The argument above is based on another argument that contains
A) circular reasoning
B) an attempt to refute a generalization by means of an exceptional case
C) an analogy between the past and the future
D) an appeal to popular beliefs and values
E) an attack on the character of the opposition.

Which of the following, if true, would most likely be part of the evidence used to
refute the conclusion above?

A) Accountants, lawyers, and physicians attained their current relatively high
levels of income and prestige at about the same time that the pay and status of
teachers, bank tellers, and secretaries slipped.
B) When large numbers of men join a female-dominated occupation, such as
airline flight attendant, the status and pay of the occupation tend to increase.
C) The demand for teachers and secretaries has increased significantly in recent
years, while the demand for bank tellers has remained relatively stable.
D) If present trends in the awarding of law degrees to women continue, it will be
at least two decades before the majority of lawyers are women.
E) The pay and status of female accountants, lawyers, and physicians today are
governed by significantly different economic and sociological forces than
were the pay and status of female teachers, bank tellers, and secretaries in the
past.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by sbasha » Thu Aug 20, 2009 9:30 am
Answer for 1 - IMO C ( Check the wordings in the stem "The Past" and "will")

A) circular reasoning - No chicken/egg situation here
B) an attempt to refute a generalization by means of an exceptional case - not refuting though
C) an analogy between the past and the future
D) an appeal to popular beliefs and values - author is not appealing
E) an attack on the character of the opposition. - definitely no no,

Answer for 2 -IMO E
Regards

Syed Basha
Join the discussion

by pradeepsarathy » Thu Aug 20, 2009 9:40 am
1- IMO C

2 - IMO E
as well...
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Fri Aug 21, 2009 6:46 am
1.OA :C
2.OA :E

Cheers to the one who popped up right cookies!!!
Join the discussion

by kris77 » Sun May 15, 2016 3:58 pm
Cannot decide between E and C. Can anyone brake down these two choices for me please
Join the discussion