Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Passenger boardings on busses almost doubled between 1995

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Tue Nov 27, 2018 7:29 pm
Timer
00:00
Your answer
Difficulty–

right wrong

Pick an answer to see how members did

Passenger boardings on busses almost doubled between 1995 and 2005, yet the actual number of trips made by passengers increased by only 38 percent over the same period. The reason for this discrepancy is that a new boarding is counted each time a passenger must make a connection in order to reach their final destination.

Which of the following, if true, best helps explain why the increase in boardings exceeded the increase in the number of bus trips between 1995 and 2005?

A) Between 1995 and 2005, the number of bus stops increased dramatically.

B) Between 1995 and 2005, the total distance of the average bus trip increased significantly.

C) Between 1995 and 2005, the proportion of bus trips requiring passengers to make a connection en route to their final destinations increased significantly.

D) The proportion of business travelers using busses increased significantly between 1995 and 2005 relative to the proportion of pleasure travelers.

E) The average seating capacity of busses increased significantly between 1995 and 2005.

OA C

Source: Princeton Review
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by deloitte247 » Thu Nov 29, 2018 9:51 am
This question requires a deep thought and calmness to answer. Let's take an overview.
With this logical analogy, you can understand and find the solution easier.
For one trip, passenger might board let say 5 buses.
So, with the explanation above, the number of boardings will exceed the number of trip. I hope this help as we proceed further.

Option A - incorrect
"Number of bus stops" differ from "number of connections." This renders this option incorrect.

Option B - incorrect
The basics of the talk here is not about the total distance. Also, the total distance doesn't correlate with the increase of number of boarding passengers

Option C - correct
Exactly! This clearly states that more bus trips now require passengers to make connections. This, however, means passengers involve in boarding of different buses to reach their destination.
Thus, this is true and best helps explains the statement above.

Option D - incorrect
The statement here has nothing to do with Business. This is nonsequitor.

Option E - incorrect
The seating capacity was not the bone of contention here and not what the statement wants a test for. This doesn't follow suit.
Join the discussion