BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Passenger boardings on busses almost doubled between 1995

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Tue Nov 27, 2018 7:29 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

Passenger boardings on busses almost doubled between 1995 and 2005, yet the actual number of trips made by passengers increased by only 38 percent over the same period. The reason for this discrepancy is that a new boarding is counted each time a passenger must make a connection in order to reach their final destination.

Which of the following, if true, best helps explain why the increase in boardings exceeded the increase in the number of bus trips between 1995 and 2005?

A) Between 1995 and 2005, the number of bus stops increased dramatically.

B) Between 1995 and 2005, the total distance of the average bus trip increased significantly.

C) Between 1995 and 2005, the proportion of bus trips requiring passengers to make a connection en route to their final destinations increased significantly.

D) The proportion of business travelers using busses increased significantly between 1995 and 2005 relative to the proportion of pleasure travelers.

E) The average seating capacity of busses increased significantly between 1995 and 2005.

OA C

Source: Princeton Review
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by deloitte247 » Thu Nov 29, 2018 9:51 am
This question requires a deep thought and calmness to answer. Let's take an overview.
With this logical analogy, you can understand and find the solution easier.
For one trip, passenger might board let say 5 buses.
So, with the explanation above, the number of boardings will exceed the number of trip. I hope this help as we proceed further.

Option A - incorrect
"Number of bus stops" differ from "number of connections." This renders this option incorrect.

Option B - incorrect
The basics of the talk here is not about the total distance. Also, the total distance doesn't correlate with the increase of number of boarding passengers

Option C - correct
Exactly! This clearly states that more bus trips now require passengers to make connections. This, however, means passengers involve in boarding of different buses to reach their destination.
Thus, this is true and best helps explains the statement above.

Option D - incorrect
The statement here has nothing to do with Business. This is nonsequitor.

Option E - incorrect
The seating capacity was not the bone of contention here and not what the statement wants a test for. This doesn't follow suit.
Join the discussion