BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Parallelogram

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by real2008 » Thu Aug 13, 2009 9:42 am
it is d
Join the discussion

by scoobydooby » Thu Aug 13, 2009 9:42 am
b) parallelogram
Join the discussion

by scoobydooby » Thu Aug 13, 2009 9:47 am
oops, a) is a parallelogram too. d it is
Join the discussion

by goelmohit2002 » Thu Aug 13, 2009 9:51 am
I also think D shd be the answer....but the definition of Manhattan at the below link seems to be saying = C......not sure why....I guess both alone are sufficient.

https://www.manhattangmat.com/geo-polygons.cfm
Join the discussion

by vikram_k51 » Thu Aug 13, 2009 9:58 am
Is ABCD parallelogram ?
a) Opposite sides i.e. (AB, CD) and (BC, AD) are equal.
b) Opposite sides i.e. (AB, CD) and (BC, AD) are parallel.

Statement B alone is Suff. but A alone is not.

A can be an isoceles trapezium.

On second thoughts:

Parallelogram"Opposite sides are parallel and equal.

Hence C.

I have a doubt.If the Opposite sides are parallel then they will definitely be equal.It should be B.Am I missing something?
Last edited by vikram_k51 on Thu Aug 13, 2009 10:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by goelmohit2002 » Thu Aug 13, 2009 10:02 am
vikram_k51 wrote:Is ABCD parallelogram ?
a) Opposite sides i.e. (AB, CD) and (BC, AD) are equal.
b) Opposite sides i.e. (AB, CD) and (BC, AD) are parallel.

Statement B alone is Suff. but A alone is not.

A can be an isoceles trapezium.
Can you tell what is isoceles trapezium and how does it look like satisfying A :-) ?
Join the discussion

by vikram_k51 » Thu Aug 13, 2009 10:06 am
goelmohit2002 wrote:
vikram_k51 wrote:Is ABCD parallelogram ?
a) Opposite sides i.e. (AB, CD) and (BC, AD) are equal.
b) Opposite sides i.e. (AB, CD) and (BC, AD) are parallel.

Statement B alone is Suff. but A alone is not.

A can be an isoceles trapezium.
Can you tell what is isoceles trapezium and how does it look like satisfying A :-) ?
Here you go:

https://images.google.com/images?hl=en&r ... e&resnum=4

I stand corrected.The opposite sides are not equal here :lol:
Join the discussion

by goelmohit2002 » Thu Aug 13, 2009 10:12 am
Thanks

But...the above figures show only sloping lines equal.....but the opposite parallel lines are unequal.....(option A says both pair of sides are equal)

Also just searched for defintion too.....

https://www.tiscali.co.uk/reference/ency ... 06746.html

it too says that only sloping sides are equal....does not talk about the parallel lines.

isn't it or I am missing something here or there is some special case that is also there ?
Join the discussion

by scoobydooby » Thu Aug 13, 2009 10:17 am
goelmohit2002 wrote:I also think D shd be the answer....but the definition of Manhattan at the below link seems to be saying = C......not sure why....I guess both alone are sufficient.

https://www.manhattangmat.com/geo-polygons.cfm

the link doesnt seem to say C.
a parallelogram is a quadrilateral in which the opposite sides are parallel and equal.

if opposite sides are are to be equal, they would be parallel as well
if opposite sides are to be parallel, they would be equal as well

so either statement is sufficient
Join the discussion

by maihuna » Thu Aug 13, 2009 10:21 am
Guys if opposite sides are parallel then it can be shown that they will be equal, so condition B should suffice.

See the following construction:

---------------------------


---------------------------

If you connect them the alternate angle will be equal. connect both the diagonal you will get two angles are equal so all angles will be equal..

now come to following fact, if we want to join these two ends by parallel sides they needs to be equal.

Combining the above two the two angles equal and a side each equal, means the two half will be congruent.

Means corresponding sides will be equal and so a parrellelogram...
Charged up again to beat the beast :)
Join the discussion

by goelmohit2002 » Thu Aug 13, 2009 10:24 am
scoobydooby wrote:
goelmohit2002 wrote:I also think D shd be the answer....but the definition of Manhattan at the below link seems to be saying = C......not sure why....I guess both alone are sufficient.

https://www.manhattangmat.com/geo-polygons.cfm

the link doesnt seem to say C.
a parallelogram is a quadrilateral in which the opposite sides are parallel and equal.

if opposite sides are are to be equal, they would be parallel as well
if opposite sides are to be parallel, they would be equal as well

so either statement is sufficient
Thanks Scooby. I also think so...can we interpret the Manhattan statement as follows:

Given By Manhattan:
===============
Parallelogram: A four-sided closed shape composed of straight lines in which the opposite sides are equal and the opposite angles are equal.

Correct one: :-)
=========
i.e. if either of the following two are given then it is parallelogram.

#1
Parallelogram: A four-sided closed shape composed of straight lines in which the opposite sides are equal.

OR
#2
Parallelogram: A four-sided closed shape composed of straight lines in which the opposite angles are equal.
Join the discussion

by vikram_k51 » Thu Aug 13, 2009 10:25 am
maihuna wrote:Guys if opposite sides are parallel then it can be shown that they will be equal, so condition B should suffice.

See the following construction:

---------------------------


---------------------------

If you connect them the alternate angle will be equal. connect both the diagonal you will get two angles are equal so all angles will be equal..

now come to following fact, if we want to join these two ends by parallel sides they needs to be equal.

Combining the above two the two angles equal and a side each equal, means the two half will be congruent.

Means corresponding sides will be equal and so a parrellelogram...

It should be D.

If the opposite sides are equal they will def be parallel and if they are parallel they will also be equal.
Join the discussion

by madhur_ahuja » Sat Aug 15, 2009 10:02 am
vikram_k51 wrote:
maihuna wrote:Guys if opposite sides are parallel then it can be shown that they will be equal, so condition B should suffice.

See the following construction:

---------------------------


---------------------------

If you connect them the alternate angle will be equal. connect both the diagonal you will get two angles are equal so all angles will be equal..

now come to following fact, if we want to join these two ends by parallel sides they needs to be equal.

Combining the above two the two angles equal and a side each equal, means the two half will be congruent.

Means corresponding sides will be equal and so a parrellelogram...

It should be D.

If the opposite sides are equal they will def be parallel and if they are parallel they will also be equal.
In the trapezium, the non parallel sides can be equal. It cannot be D.

It should be C
Join the discussion

Why I dont think it is C

by mark412 » Mon Aug 17, 2009 2:24 pm
Guys,

If it is C, that means that the opposite sides are equal length and parallel to one another.

These two properties hold for a rectangle as well. The choice should be E. The difference between the two is that rectangles have 90 degree angles while a parallelogram's interior angles add up to 360 degrees.

I go with E
Join the discussion