BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of complete EA OnDemand
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Parallelism Issue

Expert replies
by student22 » Sat Jun 12, 2010 7:22 pm
According to a 1996 survey by the National Association of College an University Business Officers, more than three times as many independent institutions of higher education charge tuition and fees of under $8,000 a year than those that charge over $16,000.
A) than those that charge
B) than are charging
C) than to charge
D) as charge
E) as those charging

OA: E

I understand why it should be narrowed down to D and E, because of the as X as Y idiom. But what I don't understand is how, that charge is parallel to those charging. Shouldn't it be, as those that charge over $16,000? Thanks!
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by hardik.jadeja » Sun Jun 13, 2010 2:39 am
I had the same doubt when I first tried to solve this question.
Join the discussion

by rockeyb » Sun Jun 13, 2010 3:28 am
D) as charge
E) as those charging
Option D dose not say who is charging the fees .

The use of THOSE refers to institutes and the sentence is comparing institutes charging fees of under $8,000 to the institutes charging fees of over $16,000.


So I think comparison the major issue here rather than parallelism.
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"
Join the discussion

by student22 » Sun Jun 13, 2010 7:51 am
Sorry if I wasn't clear. I understand the need for "those". What I'm having trouble with is the parallelism between charge and charging. When is it correct to compare those two tenses?

Basically my question is this: Is this simply a bad question? Or is there a specific rule when you can safely compare two different tenses like that?
Join the discussion

by rockeyb » Sun Jun 13, 2010 8:12 pm
student22 wrote:Sorry if I wasn't clear. I understand the need for "those". What I'm having trouble with is the parallelism between charge and charging. When is it correct to compare those two tenses?

Basically my question is this: Is this simply a bad question? Or is there a specific rule when you can safely compare two different tenses like that?
Parallelism dose not have to be similar tenses or similar clauses always . Many have a misconception that parallelism acts as an equal to sign (=) so two things must always be parallel .

But that is not always true . Yes we need to make two clause parallel in case to achieve parallelism, we need keep the verb in same tense to achieve parallelism , but some time achieving parallelism in meaning is more important than structural parallelism .

If we take example above its an example were we achieve parallelism in meaning and not structurally . Another example of such a case is Q39 OG 11 SC.

Well I am no expert but this is what I have understood , any additional comments are welcome .
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"
Join the discussion

by student22 » Mon Jun 14, 2010 11:46 am
I took a look at that question. That situation is a little bit different from this one. There it has 2 participle phrases: spawned and extending. So even though the tense is different, grammatically they're the same (i.e. both participles).

But I see what you mean when you said that in this sentence charge and charging are logically similar. I guess they both accomplish the same role, and while that charge would be preferable, I can see why charging is acceptable.
Join the discussion

by outreach » Mon Jun 14, 2010 8:19 pm
Correct idiom is "more than.. as many" - "as"
'charging' describes the 2nd set of univs
'those' is the approp pronoun
E
-------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
General blog
https://amarnaik.wordpress.com
MBA blog
https://amarrnaik.blocked/
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1