My Pick is C.

reason: In the argument But it is absurd to say 'I know that this is a tadpole and that all tadpoles turn into frogs, but why should I believe that this(tadpole) will turn into a frog?".

Its given that All tadpoles turn into frogs...so it is absurd to say but why should I believe that this will turn into a frog? , So I can't say that because>> All tadpoles turn into frogs. is already given.

now pay attention to below choice:
(C) Birds chirp only in the morning but why should I believe that this is a morning because birds are chirping

its given that Birds chirp only in the morning, so i have to say that this is a morning because birds are chirping, otherwise it would be absurd.

A and D could be absurd if you add only to them ...

(A) I know only girls carry handbags but why should I believe you are a girl just because you are carrying a handbag.

(D) Dogs bark only at strangers but why should I believe that I am a stranger just because the dog is barking at me.

(B) I know roses bloom in winter but why should I believe that this is a rose because its winter.
It's actually opposing the relationships , so it is out.

(E) Apes love nuts, all the nuts are gone why should I believe that the apes have eaten all the nuts.
Also if All the nuts are gone it does not been that Apes have eaten them...not an absurd.


OA pls.

This one is really hard, at least for me I can say

If I have to quickly mark an answer ( within 2 mins) I would prefer to mark C. I am assuming 'C' has a misprinting rose for morning. If this is not the case then C won't make any sense and pls don't read below,

C) Birds chirp only in the morning but why should I believe that this is morning because birds are chirping.

Question stem,
I know that this is a tadpole and that all tadpoles turn into frogs,...

If I simply go by the means of controlling modifiers of identical wording, given the strong nature of wording, I would mark C and move on.

IMO C.
"Here I commit the absurdity of simultaneously giving the proof of a conclusion and casting doubt on the conclusion" - absurdity is to diubt the conclusion for which the poof is already.

evidence - birds chirp only in the morning
conclusion - brids achirping so it has to be morning , it would be absurd to question this conclusion.

A seems to be the best choice here