BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

parallel CR

Expert replies
by blaster » Mon Jul 11, 2011 10:47 am
Once people habitually engaged in conversation, now the television competes for their attention. When the television is on, communication between family members stops. Where there is no communication, family ties become frayed and eventually snap. Therefore, the only solution is to get rid of the television.

Which one of the following is most closely parallel in its reasoning to the flawed reasoning in the argument above?

(A) Once friendships thrived on shared leisure time. But contemporary economic pressures minimize the amount of free time people have and thus jeopardize many friendships.

(B) Once people listened to the radio while pursuing other activities. Now they passively watch television. Therefore, radio was less distracting for most people than television is.

(C) Once sports enthusiasts regularly engaged in sports, but now they watch spectator sports when they could be getting physical exercise. Without physical exercise, health deteriorates. Therefore, the only remedy is to eliminate spectator sports.

(D) Once people were willing to tailor their day to the constraints of a bus or train schedule: now they are spoiled by the private car. The only solution is for government to offer financial incentives to encourage the use of public transportation.

(E) Once people did their shopping in urban retail districts, where they combined their shopping with other errands. Now many people shop in suburban malls, where they concentrate on shopping exclusively. Therefore, shopping has become a leisure time activity.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Ozlemg » Mon Jul 11, 2011 11:39 am
For me correct answer is C

In the question stem, it is said that :
When Tv is on, there is no conversation...
So it is assumed that when TV is off, there will be conversation...

Same reasoning happens for C. When they watch spectator sports, they do not exercise.
So it is assumed that when there is no spectator sports, there will be engagement in sports.

(C) Once sports enthusiasts regularly engaged in sports, but now they watch spectator sports when they could be getting physical exercise. Without physical exercise, health deteriorates. Therefore, the only remedy is to eliminate spectator sports.
The more you suffer before the test, the less you will do so in the test! :)
Join the discussion

by xxpatzz » Mon Jul 11, 2011 12:30 pm
IMO:C
Join the discussion

by tpr-becky » Mon Jul 11, 2011 12:39 pm
The correct answer is C because the stem presents a problem and then says that the only solution is the eliminate the problem. Only C does this.

Also we have a match for the first statement - people used to do one thing but now they do a new thing.

The second part - the new thing is harming people

The third part - only solution is to elminate the new thing.
Becky
Master GMAT Instructor
The Princeton Review
Irvine, CA
Join the discussion

by tanviet » Mon Jul 11, 2011 9:12 pm
this kind of question is rare in OG book and on gmat. If it appear it maybe easy and not so hard as it is in LSAT. Critical Reasoning Bible have a chapter for this kin of question but I do not study this chapter for the reason I said. I also do not study bold phrase questions which is at the end of the test and not important.

Is my thinking correct?.
Join the discussion

by blaster » Wed Jul 13, 2011 10:38 am
duongthang wrote:this kind of question is rare in OG book and on gmat. If it appear it maybe easy and not so hard as it is in LSAT. Critical Reasoning Bible have a chapter for this kin of question but I do not study this chapter for the reason I said. I also do not study bold phrase questions which is at the end of the test and not important.

Is my thinking correct?.
regarding Bold CR question i think you are not right. at least 1 question will be on real gmat and this kind of CR are one of the toughs.
Join the discussion

by Prashant Ranjan » Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:33 pm
It never pays to keep a very narrow focus on CR or RC questions. It would be very wrong to say that these kind of questions are atypical of GMAT since in that case, in a way (I think), we are limiting our own thinking. There is clearly no demarcation of hard questions and easy questions on GMAT since these opinions are very subjective.
This question is very typical of Pattern/ Method of reasoning questions, although I am not certain of the degree of compliance of this question. However if you approach this question, by focusing not on the content but on the structure of the reasoning, then this question is not so difficult to crack.

The argument says that
X is not happening when Y is happening.
So when X doesn't happen, then it is bound to lead to Z.

This essentially is a flawed thinking. We assume here that X doesn't happen otherwise too. And X is the only reason that leads to Z.
This pattern of reasoning is followed only in (C). In (C) the author assumes that people don't do physical exercise when they are not watching it, and lack of physical exercise is the only reason to lead to deterioration of health.

Thanks
Prashant
Join the discussion