BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Paradox Question!!!

Expert replies
by dv2020 » Mon May 30, 2011 6:04 am
A survey of alumni of the class of 1960 at Aurora University yielded puzzling results. When asked to indicate their academic rank, half of the respondents reported that they were in the top quarter of the graduating class in 1960.

Which one of the following most helps account for the apparent contradiction above?

(A) A disproportionately large number of high-ranking alumni responded to the survey.
(B) Few, if any, respondents were mistaken about their class rank.
(C) Not all the alumni who were actually in the top quarter responded to the survey.
(D) Almost all of the alumni who graduated in 1960 responded to the survey.
(E) Academic rank at Aurora University was based on a number of considerations in addition to average grades.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by sivaelectric » Mon May 30, 2011 6:09 am
My Choice B
If I am wrong correct me :), If my post helped let me know by clicking the Thanks button ;).

Chitra Sivasankar Arunagiri
Join the discussion

by cans » Mon May 30, 2011 6:10 am
IMO A
Join the discussion

by sivaelectric » Mon May 30, 2011 6:13 am
Hi Cans, when you say A does it not contradict the year mentioned. The alumni were supposed to be from 1960 only.
If I am wrong correct me :), If my post helped let me know by clicking the Thanks button ;).

Chitra Sivasankar Arunagiri
Join the discussion

by dv2020 » Mon May 30, 2011 6:27 am
The OA is indeed A but i feel for this to be the correct AC there need to assumptions within the AC as pointed out by sivaelectric above.
@cans can you throw some light...
thanks
Join the discussion

by newton9 » Mon May 30, 2011 7:08 am
P: Half of the respondents responded that they are in top quarter of their class.

The only way this can be true is if most of the respondents to the survey are high-ranking.

Say there are 100 members and 25 members were surveyed.

If 20 of them responded that they were in top quarter of the class, this means that a higher proportion of the respondents were high-ranking.

A is the answer.

C actually doesn't explain the paradox.
Join the discussion

by Frankenstein » Mon May 30, 2011 7:10 am
Hi,
Lets say there are 80 students in the class of 1960 and 28 students attended the survey. More than half of them were from top quarter of the class. That means, out of 28, 14 were ranked below 20 of the 80 student class, and the remaining 14 students were from the rank-21 to rank-80 pool. That means the survey group has disproportionately larger number(50%) of high-ranking(rank-1 to rank-20) students. This is disproportionate because, if it were uniform, roughly 7 students should be from top-20 and the remaining 21 from rank-21 to rank-80.

Cheers!
Join the discussion

by subhashghosh » Mon May 30, 2011 7:26 am
+1 for A.
Join the discussion

by cans » Mon May 30, 2011 11:44 am
sivaelectric wrote:Hi Cans, when you say A does it not contradict the year mentioned. The alumni were supposed to be from 1960 only.
Class of 1960 means that class graduated in 1960. (not that it starts in 1960)
And question mentions that respondents reported that they were in the top quarter of the graduating class in 1960. Thus No contradiction. :)
Join the discussion

by dv2020 » Mon May 30, 2011 11:55 am
The key here is to read the argument carefully...it says When asked to indicate their academic rank, half of the respondents reported that they were in the top quarter of the graduating class in 1960.

so it is half of the respondents nowhere in the argument it says that all the graduating class was contacted/surveyed

So it was passive/careless reading on my part to miss this one.....:(
Join the discussion

by sivaelectric » Mon May 30, 2011 8:34 pm
Careless on my side too dv2020 :( thanks for bringing out that point. :)
If I am wrong correct me :), If my post helped let me know by clicking the Thanks button ;).

Chitra Sivasankar Arunagiri
Join the discussion