BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

p and q are integers

Expert replies
by uptowngirl92 » Mon Jul 20, 2009 7:54 am
If p and q are integers and neither p nor q is equal to 0, is p/q > q/p?
1. p^2 > q^2
2.p^3 > q^3

Allright. Simplifying the main equation,
p/q > q/p
= p^2 > q^2.

Is'nt this what the first stmt. is clearly stating?So I answered A and clearly it is wrong.Shed some light guys!
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: p and q are integers

by real2008 » Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:12 am
uptowngirl92 wrote:If p and q are integers and neither p nor q is equal to 0, is p/q > q/p?
1. p^2 > q^2
2.p^3 > q^3

Allright. Simplifying the main equation,
p/q > q/p
= p^2 > q^2.

Is'nt this what the first stmt. is clearly stating?So I answered A and clearly it is wrong.Shed some light guys!
(sorry, I have modified my post)

1. p^2 > q^2
=> (p^2/q^2)>1 [since q^2 >0]
=> (p/q)^2>1
=> (p/q)>1 or (p/q)<-1

now if (p/q)>1, then p/q > q/p

but if p/q<-1 then p/q < q/p

hence not sufficient

2. p^3 > q^3

i) p/q>1 if q>0

so p/q>q/p

ii) but if p>0, q<0 and |p|=|q|

then p/q = q/p

hence not sufficient

Taking both the statements together,

p^3>q^3 & p^2>q^2

case1) if p>q & (p & q>0)

or p/q>q/p

case2) if p>|q| & (p>1 and q<-1 )

p/q<q/p

Hence E
Last edited by real2008 on Mon Jul 20, 2009 10:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by raghavsarathy » Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:19 am
I think we need to solve this question without simplifying the main statement.

For statement 1.

Take p= -3 and q= 2 p^2 > q^2 but the main statement is not satisfied.
Take p =3 and q= 2 p^2 > q^2 and the main statement is satisfied.
Hence A is not sufficient.


For statement 2
p^3 > q^3.

Take both p nad q as positive. p> q to satisfy the eqn
The main statement not becomens p/q > q/p

Take p positive and q negative

p = 2 , q= -1
In this case p/q < q/p

Hence B is insufficient

Taking both statements together

Take p =2 , q= 1 p^2 > q^2 and p^3 > q^3

We also get p/q > q/p

Take the example of p =2 and q= -1 used above.

We get p/q < q/p

Hence both statements are not sufficient

E
Join the discussion

by shibal » Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:38 am
IMO E

Stmt 1 - isn't sufficient if you try p=-3 and q=2
Stmt 2 - if we try p=3 and q=-2 we see that isn't suff
Join the discussion

by vinayakdl » Mon Jul 20, 2009 10:29 am
I think answer is E

I agree with raghavsarathy that you should not simply the equations here.

Vinayak
Join the discussion