BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Over the past three decades, the number of hospital beds ava

Expert replies
by hazelnut01 » Sat Apr 22, 2017 9:47 pm
Over the past three decades, the number of hospital beds available for inpatient psychiatric treatment in the United States has declined from 4 per 1,000 population to 1.3 per 1,000 population. Over the same period in Japan, beds increased from 1 per 1,000 population to 2.9 per 1,000 population. Also during this period, annual mortality rates for persons with mental disorders have risen substantially in the United States, while declining in Japan.

Which of the following, if true, would cast the most serious doubt on the conclusion that the reduction in hospital beds is principally responsible for the increase in mortality in the United States?

(A) The number of hospital beds available for inpatient psychiatric treatment in Canada has declined over the past three decades, with no increase in mortality.
(B) Due to advances in medical care and training over the past three decades, outpatient treatment is more effective than inpatient treatment for many mental disorders.
(C) The incidence of mental disorders in Japan has been decreasing, even as the country has increased the number of beds available for inpatient psychiatric treatment.
(D) Over the past three decades, Japan has offered state-sponsored health insurance to all citizens, while the United States has not.
(E) Over the past three decades, the incidence of mental disorders that are more likely to end in death has risen in the United States and declined in Japan.

Source : Manhattan GMAT Foundations of Verbal, 6th Edition
OA=E
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by elias.latour.apex » Wed Apr 26, 2017 2:38 am
The first step in a critical reasoning problem is to read the question. This problem illustrates more even more clearly than others why this is so important. In this case the conclusion is contained in the question portion. If we don't read that, we won't have any idea what we need to do.

The logic of the argument is fairly straight forward. There has been an increase in mortality in the United States whereas mortality has declined in Japan. We also know that the number of beds has increased in Japan whereas the number of beds has declined in the US. The argument implies that the lack of beds is the cause of the increase in mortality.

However, we do not know that this change is the real cause. There could be many other causes. Perhaps the difference in diet is a factor. Perhaps there are genetic factors. There could be a number of reasons that would explain this difference that have nothing to do with the number of beds.

A is a possible answer. If the number of beds has declined in Canada without affecting mortality rate, this might be shown to weaken the causal relationship between number of beds and patient mortality. However, this number is not the same as the type of information we have been given in the problem. The problem shows number of beds per thousand population. Since answer choice A doesn't give this type of information, it should be considered a weak answer.
B provides irrelevant information. We are not interested in the difference between outpatient and inpatient care.
C provides us with more information, but since the conclusion is about the United States and not about Japan, this information doesn't seem that useful.
D is a possible answer because it offers another difference between care in Japan and in the United States. However, it requires us to speculate about the relationship between state-sponsored insurance and mortality rate. It's possible that many Americans have private health insurance or enough financial resources to pay for their own treatment. This should be considered a weak answer.
E is the best answer. It clearly suggests a cause for the increase in mortality that has nothing to do with the number of beds offered.
Elias Latour
Verbal Specialist @ ApexGMAT
blog.apexgmat.com
+1 (646) 736-7622
Join the discussion