BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Orthodox medicine

Expert replies
by madhur_ahuja » Thu Aug 13, 2009 8:28 pm
Orthodox medicine is ineffective at both ends of the spectrum of ailments. At the more trivial end, orthodox medicine is largely ineffective in treating aches, pains and allergies, and, at the other extreme, it has yet to produce a cure for serious, life-threatening diseases such as advanced cancer and lupus. People turn to alternative medicine when orthodox medicine fails to help them and when it produces side effects that are unacceptable to them. One of the reasons alternative medicines is free of such side effects is that it does not have any effects at all.

If the statements above are true, which one of the following can be properly inferred from them?

(A) Practitioners of alternative medicine are acting in bad faith.

(B) There are some medical conditions for which no orthodox or alternative treatment is effective.

(C) There are some trivial illnesses that can be treated effectively by the methods of alternative medicine.

(D) There are no effective medical treatments that are free from unacceptable side effects.

(E) Orthodox medicine will eventually produce a solution for the diseases that are currently incurable.

The charge made above against alternative medicine is most seriously weakened if it is true that

(A) predictions based on orthodox medicine have sometimes failed, as when a patient has recovered despite the judgment of doctors that an illness is fatal

(B) alternative medicine relies on concepts of the body and of the nature of healing that differ from those on which orthodox medicine is based

(C) alternative medicine provides hope to those for whom orthodox medicine offers no cure

(D) a patient’s belief in the medical treatment the patient is receiving can release vthe body’s own chemical painkillers, diminish allergic reactions, and promote healing

(E) many treatments used for a time by orthodox medicine have later been found to be totally ineffective
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by ankit1383 » Fri Aug 14, 2009 2:31 am
IMO 1 B 2 D
explanation after OA
Join the discussion

Re: Orthodox medicine

by vikram_k51 » Fri Aug 14, 2009 2:56 am
madhur_ahuja wrote:Orthodox medicine is ineffective at both ends of the spectrum of ailments. At the more trivial end, orthodox medicine is largely ineffective in treating aches, pains and allergies, and, at the other extreme, it has yet to produce a cure for serious, life-threatening diseases such as advanced cancer and lupus. People turn to alternative medicine when orthodox medicine fails to help them and when it produces side effects that are unacceptable to them. One of the reasons alternative medicines is free of such side effects is that it does not have any effects at all.

If the statements above are true, which one of the following can be properly inferred from them?

(A) Practitioners of alternative medicine are acting in bad faith.

(B) There are some medical conditions for which no orthodox or alternative treatment is effective.

(C) There are some trivial illnesses that can be treated effectively by the methods of alternative medicine.

(D) There are no effective medical treatments that are free from unacceptable side effects.

(E) Orthodox medicine will eventually produce a solution for the diseases that are currently incurable.

The charge made above against alternative medicine is most seriously weakened if it is true that

(A) predictions based on orthodox medicine have sometimes failed, as when a patient has recovered despite the judgment of doctors that an illness is fatal

(B) alternative medicine relies on concepts of the body and of the nature of healing that differ from those on which orthodox medicine is based

(C) alternative medicine provides hope to those for whom orthodox medicine offers no cure

(D) a patient’s belief in the medical treatment the patient is receiving can release vthe body’s own chemical painkillers, diminish allergic reactions, and promote healing

(E) many treatments used for a time by orthodox medicine have later been found to be totally ineffective

B

D
Join the discussion

by madhur_ahuja » Fri Aug 14, 2009 5:32 am
OA after explanation
Join the discussion

by perfectstranger » Sat Aug 15, 2009 11:00 am
D
C
Please do not post answers visibly . Please hide them or post them later after the discussion.
Join the discussion

by abhisec » Sat Aug 15, 2009 11:27 am
1)D
2)D
Join the discussion

by sk8ternite » Sat Aug 15, 2009 1:47 pm
1)B
2)D
Join the discussion

by capnx » Sat Aug 15, 2009 9:13 pm
For 1st question, why not C?

I go with D for the second question.
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Sun Aug 16, 2009 1:30 am
B for the first one..
Couldn't think of anything for the second one.. Can someone please explain the logic for D.. If the medicine acts as a kind of placebo then wouldn't it be equally good for the orthodox one..
Join the discussion

Explanation

by enniguy » Sun Aug 16, 2009 2:09 am
B & D.

Expln:
1.
A. Baseless
B. Statement says that Orthodox medicines are ineffective at both end of the spectrum and alternate medicines have no effect at all. So we can safely conclude B
C. May be. But statement does not mention it anywhere, does it?
D. There could be meds without side effects. Out of Scope.
E. God knows. Out of scope.

2. Question says, "The charge made above against alternative medicine". What's the charge? "it does not have any effects at all". If alternate medicine indeed does what D says, then it is having effects on the patient although these effects may not be evident.

OA Please!
Join the discussion

by Spring2009 » Sun Aug 16, 2009 7:07 pm
B and B.
Join the discussion

by missionGMAT007 » Mon Aug 17, 2009 2:40 am
IMO
1, B
2, A

OA please..
Join the discussion

by winsome_vagabond » Mon Aug 17, 2009 2:49 am
B and B


enniguy : why not B for Q2 for the same reason that you provided.
Join the discussion

by enniguy » Wed Aug 19, 2009 4:03 am
winsome_vagabond wrote:B and B


enniguy : why not B for Q2 for the same reason that you provided.
Because B to me is just superficial. It says that, "alternative medicine relies on concepts of the body and of the nature of healing". But we don't know what those concepts are. What has got nature of healing to do with body? We don't know. Secondly, alternative meds rely on them. Do they actually have an effect? We are not sure.

Option D says clearly what those effects can be.

This is IMO. I do not know the OA though
Join the discussion

by acenikk » Wed Aug 19, 2009 4:31 am
I will go with B and D.
Join the discussion