BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Organic Life

Expert replies
by sanyalpritish » Mon Apr 12, 2010 8:42 pm
Proponents of organic farming claim that using chemical fertilizers and pesticide
in farming is harmful to local wildlife. To produce the same amount of food,
however, more land must be under cultivation when organic farming techniques are used than when chemicals are used. Therefore, organic farming leaves less
land available as habitat for local wildlife.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the author's argument
depends?

(A) Chemical fertilizers and pesticides pose no health threat to wildlife.

(B) Wildlife living near farms where chemicals are used will not ingest any food
or water containing those chemicals.

(C) The only disadvantage to using chemicals in farming is their potential effect
on wildlife.

(D) The same crops are grown on organic farms as on farms where chemicals are
used.

(E) Land cultivated by organic farming methods no longer constitutes a habitat
for wildlife
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Phirozz » Mon Apr 12, 2010 9:08 pm
IMO E

organc farming leaves less land for wild life. Its valid only when E is assumed
Join the discussion

by liferocks » Mon Apr 12, 2010 9:11 pm
is the ans D because if that is not the case there might be an alternate explanation for why more land is required in organic farming than that in farming with chemicals.
Join the discussion

by grockit_andrea » Tue Apr 13, 2010 7:40 am
I would say E here. The conclusion is that organic farming leaves less land available as habitat for local wildlife; if E weren't true, and organic farmland could still be wildlife habitat, then the conclusion wouldn't make sense any more, based on the evidence. Since the question stem asks about the assumption that the argument depends on, the assumption is something that is necessary to the conclusion. Therefore, E is the best fit.
Andrea A.
Grockit Tutor
https://www.grockit.com
Join the discussion

by sanyalpritish » Tue Apr 13, 2010 10:07 am
OA_E
Thanks
Join the discussion

by paes » Wed Apr 14, 2010 1:02 am
D ;

While comparing the two methods, the assumption should be that the methods are performed under the similar circumstances.

E: weakens the argument, can't be a assumption.
Join the discussion