BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Only a 25% fare increase for the Jefferson Tunnel into Gotha

Expert replies
by subh2273 » Sun Oct 07, 2018 11:09 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

Only a 25% fare increase for the Jefferson Tunnel into Gotham city will allow the traffic that is so congested there to be alleviated. The Washington Tunnel (just 2 miles north) going into Gotham city, would, if expanded to 4 lanes, be an attractive alternative for fully 30% of inbound traffic. Nevertheless, experts reject the claim that expanding the Washington Tunnel into a 4-lane tunnel would end the traffic congestion in the Jefferson Tunnel.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to justify experts' position?
(A)
Expanding the Washington Tunnel to a 4-lane tunnel would require not only substantial construction at the tunnel itself, but also the construction of new expanded highways going into and exiting the tunnels.
(B)
A second largely undeveloped tunnel close to Jefferson Tunnel would be a more attractive alternative than Washington Tunnel for many passengers who now use the Jefferson Tunnel.
(C)
The Washington Tunnel lies in a relatively undeveloped area but would, if it became a 4-lane tunnel with higher traffic, the surrounding area near the tunnel would be a magnet for commercial and residential development.
(D)
If the average car or truck has to wait 30-40 minutes to pass through the tunnel, the chance for cars to run out of fuel and cause emergency breakdowns adds significantly to the risks of operating a congested tunnel.

(E)
More than sixty percent of cars entering through the Jefferson tunnel continue on to a connecting bridge, only accessible via the Jefferson Tunnel, to reach their final destination on Goliath Island.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by deloitte247 » Sun Oct 14, 2018 12:07 pm
Option A - CORRECT.
This option best justify the expert position. Since only a 25% fare increase for the Jefferson Tunnel into Gotham city will allow the traffic that is so congested there to be alleviated, then there would be no need for an additional 2 miles north journey before getting into Gotham city. However, it will be unwise to incur more cost by expanding the Washington Tunnel to a 4-lane tunnel which would require not only substantial construction at the tunnel itself, but also the construction of new expanded highways going into and exiting the tunnels.

Option B - INCORRECT.
This option can also be an alternative to the experts position if the second largely undeveloped tunnel close to Jefferson Tunnel would be less expensive to reconstruct than the Washington Tunnel, and also would be an attractive alternative than Washington Tunnel for many passengers who now use the Jefferson Tunnel.

Option C - INCORRECT.
The location of the Washington Tunnel is not the basic reason for the experts opposition, but rather the cost of developing the 4-lane tunnel and the difference in distance to Gotham city is of concern.

Option D - INCORRECT.
This also is option is also of upmost concern but not really the main reason for the opposition by the expert.

Option E - INCORRECT.
The claim that more than sixty percent of cars entering through the Jefferson tunnel continue on to a connecting bridge, only accessible via the Jefferson Tunnel, to reach their final destination on Goliath Island is also a reason to oppose the argument.
Join the discussion