BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Online Home Delivery

Expert replies
by ozlemmetje » Thu Jan 22, 2015 7:48 am
A decade after the demise of early entrants such as Webvan, each of the successful competitors in the online home-delivery industry have either developed new world-class supply-chain capabilities or already have existing strengths in logistics for traditional "bricks and mortar" stores.

a)either has developed new world-class supply-chain capabilities or already has

b)has either developed new world-class supply-chain capabilities or has already

Can someone explain why the correct answer is a but not b? I know It has to do with parallelism but I cannot spot the error.



Thanks!
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by MartyMurray » Thu Jan 22, 2015 8:25 am
ozlemmetje wrote:A decade after the demise of early entrants such as Webvan, each of the successful competitors in the online home-delivery industry have either developed new world-class supply-chain capabilities or already have existing strengths in logistics for traditional "bricks and mortar" stores.

a)either has developed new world-class supply-chain capabilities or already has

b)has either developed new world-class supply-chain capabilities or has already

Can someone explain why the correct answer is a but not b? I know It has to do with parallelism but I cannot spot the error.
In b, has comes before either. So b is saying each has either this or that.

Now fill it in and you get each has either developed capabilities or has already existing strengths.

If we just look at the part after the or, the each has that part, we get each has has already existing strengths.

Doesn't make sense.

a on the other hand says each either this or that. Fill it in to get each either has developed capabilities or has already existing strengths. So what's after either and what's after or are contrasting ideas that work together pretty cleanly and are basically if not perfectly parallel. So while a may be a little awkward, it's way better than b.
Marty Murray
Perfect Scoring Tutor With Over a Decade of Experience
MartyMurrayCoaching.com
Contact me at [email protected] for a free consultation.
Join the discussion

by ozlemmetje » Thu Jan 22, 2015 10:23 am
Hello,

Thanks for trying to explain, but I still don't understand :(
Join the discussion

by ozlemmetje » Thu Jan 22, 2015 10:44 am
Hello,

Thanks for explaining.
Join the discussion

by MartyMurray » Thu Jan 22, 2015 10:49 am
Here is the one thing that matters.

In using choice b we create each has either x or y. Get it? Each one has one of the following. Each has x, or each has y.

x is developed new world-class supply-chain capabilities.

y is has already existing strengths.

Notice the word has appears in y. It also appears in each has.

Using x alone we create Each has developed new world-class supply-chain capabilities.

Using y alone we create Each has has already existing strengths.

The word has is repeated.

So the sentence as a whole does not work, because the has before either refers to what is after either and what is after or, and after or there is another has.

It's like this. She has either apples or oranges. That is the correct version.

The incorrect version would be She has either apples or has oranges. In this version she has has oranges.
Marty Murray
Perfect Scoring Tutor With Over a Decade of Experience
MartyMurrayCoaching.com
Contact me at [email protected] for a free consultation.
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Jan 22, 2015 12:05 pm
The PRESENT PERFECT SINGULAR is composed of has + VERBed:
has developed
has promised
has added

In this verb form, has is a HELPING VERB and VERBed is a PARTICIPLE.

In the construction either X or Y, EITHER and OR are known as SEESAW conjunctions.
The reason:
Just like two children on a seesaw, X and Y must BALANCE EACH OTHER.

Generally, if either is followed by a participle, or should also be followed by a participle.
B: has either DEVELOPED new world-class supply-chain capabilities or HAS
Here, either is followed by a PARTICIPLE (developed), but or is followed by a NON-PARTICIPLE (has).
This constitutes an error of parallelism.
Eliminate B.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1