BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

one question for help

Expert replies
by lingerer » Fri Jan 21, 2011 7:46 pm
10.Today's low gasoline prices make consumers willing

to indulge their preference for larger cars, which

consume greater amounts of gasoline as fuel. So

United States automakers are unwilling to pursue

the development of new fuel-efficient technologies

aggressively. The particular reluctance of the United

States automobile industry to do so, however, could

threaten the industry's future.





Which of the following, if true, would provide the

most support for the claim above about the future

of the United States automobile industry?



(A) A prototype fuel-efficient vehicle, built five years

"ago, achieves a very high 81 miles per gallon

"on the highway and 63 in the city, but its

"materials are relatively costly.

(B) Small cars sold by manufacturers in the United

States are more fuel efficient now than before

"the sudden jump in oil prices in 1973.

(C) Automakers elsewhere in the world have slowed

"the introduction of fuel-efficient technologies

"but have pressed ahead with research and

"development of them in preparation for a

"predicted rise in world oil prices.

(D) There are many technological opportunities for

"reducing the waste of energy in cars and light

"trucks through weight, aerodynamic drag,

"and braking friction.

(E) The promotion of mass transit over automobiles

"as an alternative mode of transportation has

"encountered consumer resistance that is due

"in part to the failure of mass transit to accom-

"modate the wide dispersal of points of origin

"and destinations for trips.


the answer is c . just tell me how c is reasonable?
Thank you!
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Target2009 » Sat Jan 22, 2011 12:08 am
@ lingerer : Please do some formating for the post. This is almost unreadable.
Regards
Abhishek
------------------------------
MasterGmat Student
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Sat Jan 22, 2011 12:15 am
Can You pls reveal the source . Some people prefer to avoid Gmat prep , MGMAT CAT CRs before facing them in the actual tests
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Join the discussion

by RACHVIK » Sat Jan 22, 2011 3:44 am
IMO C.

It comes close to stating a reason why US automobile industry should venture into R&D for fuel-efficient vehicles else they might loose to international market.
Rachvik
Join the discussion