Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 1 and Nov 21. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 1
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 1 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand5 seats leftStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

One million year old skull ...

Expert replies
by II » Mon Nov 24, 2008 5:51 pm
See attached question from GMATPrep.

I am going through each of the answer choices trying to highlight what is wrong or right (for the correct choice) with the answer choices:

(A) Issue with original sentence:
• Idiom: “associated both” (incorrect) Vs “associated with” (correct)
• Distorts meaning of original sentence: “bear traits associated both with Homo erectus and, in addition, Homo sapiens has been found in the …”
• “has been found” – what has been found ? this looks as if it is referring to Homo Sapiens … in which case it should be “have been found”.

(B)
• Idiom: associated with should be used
• “have been found” – whats been found ? the skull. So this should be “has been found”.

(C)
• Correct use of idiom “associated with”
• “has been found” correctly refers to the “million year old skull”.

(D)
this sounds wrong to my ear ... but what grammatical rule is being broken here ?

(E)
• “have been found” should be “has been found”
dont understand what is wrong with "which indicates" ... why is "indicating" better than "which indicates" ? Is this a parallelism issue ---> bearing, indicating ?

Thanks for your input.
II
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by Tryingmybest » Mon Nov 24, 2008 6:03 pm
IMO C

Correct use of idiom. Has been correctly refers to skull .
Join the discussion

by II » Mon Nov 24, 2008 6:18 pm
Yes. C is the correct answer ... please see my comments highlighted in bold. I want to fully understand why the rest of the answer choices were wrong.

Thanks.
Join the discussion

by Tryingmybest » Mon Nov 24, 2008 6:30 pm
Choice D doesnt sound right to me. Unable to spot an error.It is awkward.

But E is clearly wrong . Which refers to a place instead of Skull.

(which or that refers to the Previous word)
Join the discussion

by II » Mon Nov 24, 2008 6:39 pm
(D)
this sounds wrong to my ear ... but what grammatical rule is being broken here ?

(E)
• “have been found” should be “has been found”

dont understand what is wrong with "which indicates" ... why is "indicating" better than "which indicates" ? Is this a parallelism issue ---> bearing, indicating ?
Join the discussion

by niraj_a » Tue Nov 25, 2008 10:45 am
in D, the second use of and is wrong and kinda changes the meaning.

in E, which incorrectly refers to Eritrea.
Join the discussion

by iamcste » Tue Nov 25, 2008 11:03 am
II wrote:(D)
this sounds wrong to my ear ... but what grammatical rule is being broken here ?

Your ears are right!

And is used to join 2 independent clauses

"found in the Afar region of XXX " is no way an independent clause. We do not have a subject. e,g what is found cant be answered.

Inclusion of And makes earlier part of sentence incomplete...You can see that there is no verb. "XXX bearing traits associated with YYY"



In this case, And distributes an independent clauses into 2 parts.


(E)
• “have been found” should be “has been found”

dont understand what is wrong with "which indicates" ... why is "indicating" better than "which indicates" ? Is this a parallelism issue ---> bearing, indicating ?


which , as a noun modifer, incorrectly modifies "Eritria"

This changes the meaning, Did "Eritria" indicate anything

Join the discussion

by II » Tue Nov 25, 2008 12:23 pm
iamcste ... you are King ! :-) Great explanations !
Join the discussion

by NSNguyen » Sat Nov 29, 2008 7:25 pm
IMO:E
Have been modify for both Homo ...homo, not for the skull
Please share your idea and your reasoning :D
https://bmnmed.com/home/
https://nguyensinguyen.vietnam21.org
Join the discussion