BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

one another vs. others?

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2012 3:58 pm
Thanked: 1 times

one another vs. others?

by lamania » Sat Apr 28, 2012 8:49 am
This question came from the new GMAT prep software.

In a state of pure commercial competition, there would be a large number of producing firms, all unfettered by governmental regulations, all seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than each other.

A)all seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than each other.
B)all seeking more successfully to meet consumer needs and wants than the others.
C)each seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than one another.
D)each seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than the others.
E)each seeking successfully to meet consumer needs and wants than another
OA: D

I can't understand why c is inaccurate. The official answer's explanation is that in C) this wording nonsensically suggests either that each firm seeks a contradictory situation in which it meets the needs and wants more successfully than do the other firms, and vice versa, or that each firm seeks to meet the needs better than the wants and to meet the wants better than the needs.
--> this explanation sounds so odd. The underlined part I agree with and it is essentially the same as option D (no?), but from "vice versa, or that..." until the end doesn't make sense to me. What's wrong with saying than one another here?
Top
Source: — Sentence Correction |
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Sat Apr 28, 2012 9:28 am
lamania wrote:This question came from the new GMAT prep software.

In a state of pure commercial competition, there would be a large number of producing firms, all unfettered by governmental regulations, all seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than each other.

A)all seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than each other.
B)all seeking more successfully to meet consumer needs and wants than the others.
C)each seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than one another.
D)each seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than the others.
E)each seeking successfully to meet consumer needs and wants than another
OA: D

I can't understand why c is inaccurate. The official answer's explanation is that in C) this wording nonsensically suggests either that each firm seeks a contradictory situation in which it meets the needs and wants more successfully than do the other firms, and vice versa, or that each firm seeks to meet the needs better than the wants and to meet the wants better than the needs.
--> this explanation sounds so odd. The underlined part I agree with and it is essentially the same as option D (no?), but from "vice versa, or that..." until the end doesn't make sense to me. What's wrong with saying than one another here?
Each other and one another are reciprocal pronouns.
Their purpose is to express actions that are RECIPROCATED.
The two brothers loved each other.
Here, the first brother loves the second; the second brother loves the first.
The members of the club fought with one another.
Here, each member is fighting with every other member.

In the SC above, there is no action being reciprocated; the firms are being COMPARED.
Hence, each other (in A) and one another (in C) are not appropriate.
Eliminate A and C.

In B and E, successfully seems to be modifying seeking. The intended meaning is not that the firms are SEEKING successfully but that they are seeking TO MEET CONSUMER WANTS AND NEEDS successfully.
Eliminate B and E.

The correct answer is D.

In the OA, it is clear that EACH FIRM is being compared to THE OTHERS.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 2789
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 12:19 am
Location: Chennai, India
Thanked: 206 times
Followed by:43 members
GMAT Score:640

by GmatKiss » Sat Apr 28, 2012 11:37 pm
In a state of pure commercial competition, there would be a large number of producing firms, all unfettered by governmental regulations, all seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than each other.

A)all seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than each other.
B)all seeking more successfully to meet consumer needs and wants than the others.
C)each seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than one another.
D)each seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than the others.
E)each seeking successfully to meet consumer needs and wants than another

IMO: D
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 416
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2007 9:08 am
Thanked: 10 times
Followed by:1 members

by gmatrant » Wed Feb 06, 2013 2:02 pm
In a state of pure commercial competition, there would be a large number of producing firms, all unfettered by governmental regulations, each seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than the others.

Can some expert please explain this sentence in terms of modifiers?
"In a state of pure commercial competition" - what does this sentence modify?
"each seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than the others" - How does this play with respect to the previous modifier "all unfettered by governmental regulations"
A kudos or thanks would do great if my answer has helped you :)
Top
User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 22
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2016 3:17 pm

by AnuGmat » Mon Mar 14, 2016 6:22 pm
GMATGuruNY wrote:
lamania wrote:This question came from the new GMAT prep software.

In a state of pure commercial competition, there would be a large number of producing firms, all unfettered by governmental regulations, all seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than each other.

A)all seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than each other.
B)all seeking more successfully to meet consumer needs and wants than the others.
C)each seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than one another.
D)each seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than the others.
E)each seeking successfully to meet consumer needs and wants than another
OA: D

I can't understand why c is inaccurate. The official answer's explanation is that in C) this wording nonsensically suggests either that each firm seeks a contradictory situation in which it meets the needs and wants more successfully than do the other firms, and vice versa, or that each firm seeks to meet the needs better than the wants and to meet the wants better than the needs.
--> this explanation sounds so odd. The underlined part I agree with and it is essentially the same as option D (no?), but from "vice versa, or that..." until the end doesn't make sense to me. What's wrong with saying than one another here?
Each other and one another are reciprocal pronouns.
Their purpose is to express actions that are RECIPROCATED.
The two brothers loved each other.
Here, the first brother loves the second; the second brother loves the first.
The members of the club fought with one another.
Here, each member is fighting with every other member.

In the SC above, there is no action being reciprocated; the firms are being COMPARED.
Hence, each other (in A) and one another (in C) are not appropriate.
Eliminate A and C.

In B and E, successfully seems to be modifying seeking. The intended meaning is not that the firms are SEEKING successfully but that they are seeking TO MEET CONSUMER WANTS AND NEEDS successfully.
Eliminate B and E.

The correct answer is D.

In the OA, it is clear that EACH FIRM is being compared to THE OTHERS.

Hi Mitch,
While solving this problem i was searching for a ing form of verb to make the it parallel with seeking .

In a state of pure commercial competition, there would be a large number of producing firms, all unfettered by governmental regulations, )each seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than the others.
I could not understand the meaning of this sentence . each seeking something and wants more successfully (is this parallel ) I know official answers are right .. this is just to familiarize myself with these kind of sentences . What do the firms want more successfully ??
thanks in advance .

Thanks
anu
Top
User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 22
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2016 3:17 pm

by AnuGmat » Mon Mar 14, 2016 6:22 pm
GMATGuruNY wrote:
lamania wrote:This question came from the new GMAT prep software.

In a state of pure commercial competition, there would be a large number of producing firms, all unfettered by governmental regulations, all seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than each other.

A)all seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than each other.
B)all seeking more successfully to meet consumer needs and wants than the others.
C)each seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than one another.
D)each seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than the others.
E)each seeking successfully to meet consumer needs and wants than another
OA: D

I can't understand why c is inaccurate. The official answer's explanation is that in C) this wording nonsensically suggests either that each firm seeks a contradictory situation in which it meets the needs and wants more successfully than do the other firms, and vice versa, or that each firm seeks to meet the needs better than the wants and to meet the wants better than the needs.
--> this explanation sounds so odd. The underlined part I agree with and it is essentially the same as option D (no?), but from "vice versa, or that..." until the end doesn't make sense to me. What's wrong with saying than one another here?
Each other and one another are reciprocal pronouns.
Their purpose is to express actions that are RECIPROCATED.
The two brothers loved each other.
Here, the first brother loves the second; the second brother loves the first.
The members of the club fought with one another.
Here, each member is fighting with every other member.

In the SC above, there is no action being reciprocated; the firms are being COMPARED.
Hence, each other (in A) and one another (in C) are not appropriate.
Eliminate A and C.

In B and E, successfully seems to be modifying seeking. The intended meaning is not that the firms are SEEKING successfully but that they are seeking TO MEET CONSUMER WANTS AND NEEDS successfully.
Eliminate B and E.

The correct answer is D.

In the OA, it is clear that EACH FIRM is being compared to THE OTHERS.

Hi Mitch,
While solving this problem i was searching for a ing form of verb to make the it parallel with seeking .

In a state of pure commercial competition, there would be a large number of producing firms, all unfettered by governmental regulations, )each seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than the others.
I could not understand the meaning of this sentence . each seeking something and wants more successfully (is this parallel ) I know official answers are right .. this is just to familiarize myself with these kind of sentences . What do the firms want more successfully ??
thanks in advance .

Thanks
anu
Top
User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 22
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2016 3:17 pm

by AnuGmat » Mon Mar 14, 2016 6:22 pm
GMATGuruNY wrote:
lamania wrote:This question came from the new GMAT prep software.

In a state of pure commercial competition, there would be a large number of producing firms, all unfettered by governmental regulations, all seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than each other.

A)all seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than each other.
B)all seeking more successfully to meet consumer needs and wants than the others.
C)each seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than one another.
D)each seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than the others.
E)each seeking successfully to meet consumer needs and wants than another
OA: D

I can't understand why c is inaccurate. The official answer's explanation is that in C) this wording nonsensically suggests either that each firm seeks a contradictory situation in which it meets the needs and wants more successfully than do the other firms, and vice versa, or that each firm seeks to meet the needs better than the wants and to meet the wants better than the needs.
--> this explanation sounds so odd. The underlined part I agree with and it is essentially the same as option D (no?), but from "vice versa, or that..." until the end doesn't make sense to me. What's wrong with saying than one another here?
Each other and one another are reciprocal pronouns.
Their purpose is to express actions that are RECIPROCATED.
The two brothers loved each other.
Here, the first brother loves the second; the second brother loves the first.
The members of the club fought with one another.
Here, each member is fighting with every other member.

In the SC above, there is no action being reciprocated; the firms are being COMPARED.
Hence, each other (in A) and one another (in C) are not appropriate.
Eliminate A and C.

In B and E, successfully seems to be modifying seeking. The intended meaning is not that the firms are SEEKING successfully but that they are seeking TO MEET CONSUMER WANTS AND NEEDS successfully.
Eliminate B and E.

The correct answer is D.

In the OA, it is clear that EACH FIRM is being compared to THE OTHERS.

Hi Mitch,
While solving this problem i was searching for a ing form of verb to make the it parallel with seeking .

In a state of pure commercial competition, there would be a large number of producing firms, all unfettered by governmental regulations, )each seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than the others.
I could not understand the meaning of this sentence . each seeking something and wants more successfully (is this parallel ) I know official answers are right .. this is just to familiarize myself with these kind of sentences . What do the firms want more successfully ??
thanks in advance .

Thanks
anu
Top
User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 22
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2016 3:17 pm

by AnuGmat » Mon Mar 14, 2016 6:22 pm
GMATGuruNY wrote:
lamania wrote:This question came from the new GMAT prep software.

In a state of pure commercial competition, there would be a large number of producing firms, all unfettered by governmental regulations, all seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than each other.

A)all seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than each other.
B)all seeking more successfully to meet consumer needs and wants than the others.
C)each seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than one another.
D)each seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than the others.
E)each seeking successfully to meet consumer needs and wants than another
OA: D

I can't understand why c is inaccurate. The official answer's explanation is that in C) this wording nonsensically suggests either that each firm seeks a contradictory situation in which it meets the needs and wants more successfully than do the other firms, and vice versa, or that each firm seeks to meet the needs better than the wants and to meet the wants better than the needs.
--> this explanation sounds so odd. The underlined part I agree with and it is essentially the same as option D (no?), but from "vice versa, or that..." until the end doesn't make sense to me. What's wrong with saying than one another here?
Each other and one another are reciprocal pronouns.
Their purpose is to express actions that are RECIPROCATED.
The two brothers loved each other.
Here, the first brother loves the second; the second brother loves the first.
The members of the club fought with one another.
Here, each member is fighting with every other member.

In the SC above, there is no action being reciprocated; the firms are being COMPARED.
Hence, each other (in A) and one another (in C) are not appropriate.
Eliminate A and C.

In B and E, successfully seems to be modifying seeking. The intended meaning is not that the firms are SEEKING successfully but that they are seeking TO MEET CONSUMER WANTS AND NEEDS successfully.
Eliminate B and E.

The correct answer is D.

In the OA, it is clear that EACH FIRM is being compared to THE OTHERS.

Hi Mitch,
While solving this problem i was searching for a ing form of verb to make the it parallel with seeking .

In a state of pure commercial competition, there would be a large number of producing firms, all unfettered by governmental regulations, )each seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than the others.
I could not understand the meaning of this sentence . each seeking something and wants more successfully (is this parallel ) I know official answers are right .. this is just to familiarize myself with these kind of sentences . What do the firms want more successfully ??
thanks in advance .

Thanks
anu
Top
User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 22
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2016 3:17 pm

by AnuGmat » Mon Mar 14, 2016 6:22 pm
GMATGuruNY wrote:
lamania wrote:This question came from the new GMAT prep software.

In a state of pure commercial competition, there would be a large number of producing firms, all unfettered by governmental regulations, all seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than each other.

A)all seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than each other.
B)all seeking more successfully to meet consumer needs and wants than the others.
C)each seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than one another.
D)each seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than the others.
E)each seeking successfully to meet consumer needs and wants than another
OA: D

I can't understand why c is inaccurate. The official answer's explanation is that in C) this wording nonsensically suggests either that each firm seeks a contradictory situation in which it meets the needs and wants more successfully than do the other firms, and vice versa, or that each firm seeks to meet the needs better than the wants and to meet the wants better than the needs.
--> this explanation sounds so odd. The underlined part I agree with and it is essentially the same as option D (no?), but from "vice versa, or that..." until the end doesn't make sense to me. What's wrong with saying than one another here?
Each other and one another are reciprocal pronouns.
Their purpose is to express actions that are RECIPROCATED.
The two brothers loved each other.
Here, the first brother loves the second; the second brother loves the first.
The members of the club fought with one another.
Here, each member is fighting with every other member.

In the SC above, there is no action being reciprocated; the firms are being COMPARED.
Hence, each other (in A) and one another (in C) are not appropriate.
Eliminate A and C.

In B and E, successfully seems to be modifying seeking. The intended meaning is not that the firms are SEEKING successfully but that they are seeking TO MEET CONSUMER WANTS AND NEEDS successfully.
Eliminate B and E.

The correct answer is D.

In the OA, it is clear that EACH FIRM is being compared to THE OTHERS.

Hi Mitch,
While solving this problem i was searching for a ing form of verb to make the it parallel with seeking .

In a state of pure commercial competition, there would be a large number of producing firms, all unfettered by governmental regulations, )each seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than the others.
I could not understand the meaning of this sentence . each seeking something and wants more successfully (is this parallel ) I know official answers are right .. this is just to familiarize myself with these kind of sentences . What do the firms want more successfully ??
thanks in advance .

Thanks
anu
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Tue Mar 15, 2016 5:43 am
AnuGmat wrote:Hi Mitch,
While solving this problem i was searching for a ing form of verb to make the it parallel with seeking .

In a state of pure commercial competition, there would be a large number of producing firms, all unfettered by governmental regulations, )each seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than the others.
I could not understand the meaning of this sentence . each seeking something and wants more successfully (is this parallel ) I know official answers are right .. this is just to familiarize myself with these kind of sentences . What do the firms want more successfully ??
thanks in advance .

Thanks
anu
wants can serve as a NOUN.
John has many wants.
Conveyed meaning:
John has many DESIRES.

OA: There would be a large number of firms, each seeking to meet consumer needs and wants.

Here, needs and wants are both NOUNS.
WHAT is each firm seeking to meet?
Each firm is seeking to meet CONSUMER NEEDS.
Each firm is seeking to meet CONSUMER WANTS.

Conveyed meaning of the sentence in red:
Each firm is seeking to meet THE WANTS OF THE CONSUMER.
In other words:
Each firm is seeking to meet THE DESIRES OF THE CONSUMER.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 72
Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2013 9:14 am
Thanked: 2 times

by chetan86 » Sun Jun 12, 2016 7:57 pm
Hi Mitch,

Could you please explain the structure of this sentence?
I am little bit confused. What is the connector between all and each?
How the phrase starting from "each" would refer to firms?

In a state of pure commercial competition, there would be a large number of producing firms, all unfettered by governmental regulations, each seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than the others.
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Mon Jun 13, 2016 2:17 am
chetan86 wrote:Hi Mitch,

Could you please explain the structure of this sentence?
I am little bit confused. What is the connector between all and each?
How the phrase starting from "each" would refer to firms?

In a state of pure commercial competition, there would be a large number of producing firms, all unfettered by governmental regulations, each seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than the others.
Check my three posts here:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/in-a-state-o ... 78633.html
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Top
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 64
Joined: Tue May 22, 2012 10:44 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by evs.teja » Thu Jun 23, 2016 2:13 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
lamania wrote:This question came from the new software.

In a state of pure commercial competition, there would be a large number of producing firms, all unfettered by governmental regulations, all seeking to meet consumer needs wants more successfully than each other.

A)all seeking to meet consumer needs wants more successfully than each other.
B)all seeking more successfully to meet consumer needs wants than the others.
C)each seeking to meet consumer needs wants more successfully than one another.
D)each seeking to meet consumer needs wants more successfully than the others.
E)each seeking successfully to meet consumer needs wants than another
OA: D


Each other one another are reciprocal pronouns.
Their purpose is to express actions that are RECIPROCATED.
The two brothers loved each other.
Here, the first brother loves the second; the second brother loves the first.
The of the club fought with one another.
Here, each member is fighting with every other member.

In the SC above, there is no action being reciprocated; the firms are being COMPARED.
Hence, each other (in A) one another (in C) are not appropriate.
Eliminate A C.
In the OA, it is clear that EACH FIRM is being compared to THE OTHERS.
Dear Mitch
How did you reach the conclusion that each firm is being compared to others ?
I feel the intended meaning should be that each firm is seeking to satisfy consumer needs wants more successfully than each of the other firm in the market.
Won't this sentence make better sense?
Please help me out where am I thinking wrog ?
Thanks
Teja


Top
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 25
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2015 4:30 am
Thanked: 1 times

by Kaustubhk » Thu Aug 03, 2017 10:48 pm
Hi Mitch,

I'm unable to understand how 'wants' is a Noun.

Can you elaborate?



GMATGuruNY wrote:
AnuGmat wrote:Hi Mitch,
While solving this problem i was searching for a ing form of verb to make the it parallel with seeking .

In a state of pure commercial competition, there would be a large number of producing firms, all unfettered by governmental regulations, )each seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than the others.
I could not understand the meaning of this sentence . each seeking something and wants more successfully (is this parallel ) I know official answers are right .. this is just to familiarize myself with these kind of sentences . What do the firms want more successfully ??
thanks in advance .

Thanks
anu
wants can serve as a NOUN.
John has many wants.
Conveyed meaning:
John has many DESIRES.

OA: There would be a large number of firms, each seeking to meet consumer needs and wants.

Here, needs and wants are both NOUNS.
WHAT is each firm seeking to meet?
Each firm is seeking to meet CONSUMER NEEDS.
Each firm is seeking to meet CONSUMER WANTS.

Conveyed meaning of the sentence in red:
Each firm is seeking to meet THE WANTS OF THE CONSUMER.
In other words:
Each firm is seeking to meet THE DESIRES OF THE CONSUMER.
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Aug 04, 2017 5:43 am
Kaustubhk wrote:Hi Mitch,

I'm unable to understand how 'wants' is a Noun.

Can you elaborate?
a want = something that is wanted.
a need = something that is needed.
a consumer want = something that is wanted by consumers.
a consumer need = something that is needed by consumers.

OA: each seeking to meet consumer needs and wants
Here:
seeking = trying.
to meet = to provide.
consumer needs and wants = things that are needed and wanted by consumers.
Conveyed meaning:
each trying to provide things that are needed and wanted by consumers.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Top
Post new topic Locked