BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

ONCE AGAIN ASSUMPTION CR

Expert replies
by gmatmachoman » Fri Sep 25, 2009 10:02 am
For several consecutive years, poultry prices at each of three statewide
grocery-store chains have exceeded the national average by about fifty
percent. Also, the per-pound difference in poultry prices among the three
stores never amounted to more than a few pennies, while among grocery
stores in other states, the prices varied by nearly a dollar over the same
period. The three chains must have conspired to not compete among
themselves and to fix their poultry prices at mutually agreed-upon levels.


The claim that the three grocery-store chains conspired to fix
poultry prices rests on which of the following assumptions for the
time period referred to above?
A. No other grocery store charged higher prices for poultry other
than the three chains.
B. Average poultry prices in the state where the three chains
operate exceeded the national average.
C. The price that grocery stores paid for poultry did not vary
significantly from state to state.
D. Consumers in the state where the three chains operate generally
prefer poultry over other meats, even if poultry is more
expensive than other meats.
E. Other grocery stores operating in the same state as the three
chains also sell poultry to consumers.

OA::-------------
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by hitmewithgmat » Fri Sep 25, 2009 5:57 pm
When it comes to "assumption" question, always remember to use this methods.(from gmat powerscore)
1.Supporter-basically you need to find a gap to fill between premise and conclusion. (this question doesn't seem to apply this method though because there is none to find a gap.)

2.Defender-(this method is a warrior like Hercules. Eliminate all the other possible factors that would weaken the argument. It seems this questions falls for this 2 method.)

A-It's too extreme and we can't assume this statement based on the premises. OUT.
B-It doesn't mention in the premises. OUT.
C-YES. our DEFENDER! by eliminating the possibilities, B statement protects the argument. BINGO!
D-Def. no in the statement. X-out.
E- Other groceries.... out of scope. OUT.

hope this helps.
Join the discussion

Re: ONCE AGAIN ASSUMPTION CR

by crackgmat007 » Fri Sep 25, 2009 9:47 pm
C for me for the above mentioned reasons.
Join the discussion

Re: ONCE AGAIN ASSUMPTION CR

by lunarpower » Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:40 am
the "defender" principle is a good one.
basically, FIND THE ASSUMPTION and WEAKEN THE CONCLUSION are exact opposites. i.e., if X is a weakener, then not-X is an assumption; if X is an assumption, then not-X is a weakener.

this argument claims that the stores were fixing prices. the only evidence given is the fact that prices varied much more in other states than in this particular state.

therefore, you could WEAKEN the argument by finding ANOTHER reason why prices would vary wildly in other states...
...and therefore any statement NEGATING such a reason would be an assumption.

if the prices in other states varied wildly because the price of poultry to the stores themselves varied wildly, then the argument would be compromised severely. therefore, choice (c), which NEGATES this line of reasoning, is an assumption.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Sat Sep 26, 2009 3:15 am
OA C

hitrates r very high it seems...

Gud Guys..Cheers to u all!!

Thanks Ron for ur effort!!
Join the discussion

by james33 » Sun May 15, 2016 9:43 pm
I think C is the best in this case.
Join the discussion